A Tale of a Tub by Jonathan Swift

This blog task is assigned by Prakruti Bhatt Ma'am (Department of English, MKBU).

{getToc} $title={Table of Contents} $count={false}

Jonathan Swift

Documentary of Jonathan Swift on YouTube/Author Documentaries: Click here.

Q.-1.|In what ways does Jonathan Swift critique the societal implications of the bookselling industry?

Ans.

Jonathan Swift’s 'A Tale of a Tub' critiques the commercialized nature of the bookselling industry through its satirical approach, particularly in "The Bookseller to the Reader," "A Farther Digression" (Section 10), and "The Conclusion" (Section 12). These sections address the profit-driven motives behind book production, parody the over-commercialization of literature, and underscore the tension between genuine intellectual efforts and the superficialities of the literary marketplace.

In "The Bookseller to the Reader," Swift mocks the bookseller's indifference to the quality of works he publishes, focusing solely on the profit motive. The bookseller reveals that the work was published without the author’s consent, emphasizing how the commercialization of literature often disregards authorial intent. He further admits that the text was delayed for six years because he believed

"he had better work on his hands,"

showcasing the arbitrary nature of the industry’s priorities. Swift also satirizes the tendency of booksellers to capitalize on trends by highlighting how modernized versions of classical works were altered to fit

"the humour of the age."

In "A Farther Digression," Swift explores the industry’s obsession with novelty, critiquing how modern authors prioritize fleeting fame over substantial intellectual contribution. He ridicules their eagerness to achieve “everlasting remembrance” by writing for the masses rather than focusing on meaningful instruction. Swift humorously states that his treatise contains both “instruction and diversion” because readers now prefer to be entertained rather than educated, pointing to the industry’s shift toward catering to public tastes instead of producing insightful literature.

In "The Conclusion," Swift extends his critique by mocking how booksellers manipulate the public through marketing strategies. He satirizes the belief that the success of a book is based on arbitrary factors like weather conditions or the time of year. The bookseller admits that certain works only sell well in

“a hard year for turnips,”

and that market trends, rather than literary merit, drive sales. Swift underscores the absurdity of this system, in which books are commodities shaped by external, non-literary forces.

Through these satirical commentaries, Swift exposes how the bookselling industry of his time prioritizes profit and entertainment over intellectual integrity, effectively critiquing the broader societal implications of this commercialization.

Q.-2.|Create a memorable phrase (i.e. tagline) to receive readers' attention towards a literary text of your choice.

Ans.

For A Tale of a Tub by Jonathan Swift:

"Question everything: Swift’s tale that dares to mock it all."

For Macbeth by William Shakespeare:

"Ambition. Betrayal. Blood:

Welcome to Macbeth’s world."

Source: Course Hero

Q.-3.|Analyze 'A Tale of a Tub' as a Religious Allegory. Discuss how the narrative of the three brothers as well as the digressions critique the various religious practices and ideologies.

Ans.

In 'A Tale of a Tub', Jonathan Swift constructs a religious allegory using the story of the three brothers—Peter, Martin, and Jack—who represent the Roman Catholic Church, the Anglican Church, and Dissenters (or Puritans), respectively. Through this allegory, Swift critiques the various religious practices and ideologies of his time, with sharp commentary on how religious institutions distort scripture to suit their own needs.

The allegory begins with the father, symbolizing God, who leaves each of his sons a coat (representing their religious beliefs) along with explicit instructions in his will, which allegorizes the Bible. The brothers are instructed not to alter their coats, but they soon begin to modify them to fit the prevailing fashions, symbolizing how religious authorities often twist scripture to justify practices that deviate from original teachings. Peter, who represents the Catholic Church, is depicted as the most corrupt of the brothers, altering his coat to an extravagant extent, which Swift uses to criticize the excessive ornamentation and corruption in Catholic rituals.

Jack, representing the Dissenters, is equally mocked for his extreme rejection of tradition. Swift presents Jack as descending into madness, paralleling the radical nature of Puritanism and its rejection of established authority. Jack's overzealous modifications to his coat are a satire on the Dissenters' reliance on individual interpretation, without the grounding of tradition. This is exemplified when Jack furiously opposes both his brothers, showing how dissent led to further fragmentation within Christianity.

In contrast, Martin, symbolizing the Anglican Church, is portrayed as the most moderate of the brothers. While he also modifies his coat, he does so with more restraint. This moderation is Swift’s critique of Anglicanism as a middle path between the extremes of Catholicism and Puritanism, yet still not free from the flaws of self-serving interpretations of scripture.

The digressions throughout the text also serve as a critique of religious practices. In these sections, Swift lampoons the absurdity of theological disputes and the pretentiousness of religious leaders who use complicated arguments to justify trivial or corrupt practices. This reinforces the allegory, as the digressions mock how religious institutions become disconnected from the core messages of faith.

Through the allegory of the brothers and the digressions, Swift critiques how religious institutions corrupt and distort the original tenets of Christianity for power and personal gain.

Source: Course Hero

Q.-4.|How has Swift critiqued the contemporary writers, writing practices and critics of his time?

Ans.

In 'A Tale of a Tub', Jonathan Swift offers a biting critique of contemporary writers, writing practices, and critics, using satire and allegory to expose their weaknesses. He targets the obsession with novelty, the superficiality of modern literary trends, and the arrogance of self-proclaimed critics.

From the very beginning in Section 1, Swift sets the tone by parodying the ambition of writers who seek fame by engaging in trivial endeavors. He writes,

“Whoever has an ambition to be heard in a crowd must press, and squeeze, and thrust, and climb with indefatigable pains.”

Here, Swift mocks how writers of his time are more concerned with gaining recognition than producing meaningful content. The metaphor of “climbing” in this passage emphasizes the competitive nature of the literary marketplace, where writers are willing to do anything to gain attention.

Section 3, which deals with critics, portrays them as creatures solely concerned with finding faults in others’ works. Swift writes,

“A true critic is a discoverer and collector of writers’ faults.”

He lampoons critics for focusing on superficial errors rather than appreciating the substance of literary works. According to Swift, critics are not interested in contributing to knowledge but rather in elevating themselves by demeaning others. This passage reflects Swift’s frustration with critics who nitpick at small mistakes instead of engaging with the larger themes and ideas of a text.

In Section 5, Swift digs further into the absurdity of contemporary writing practices. His satire in this section is directed toward the moderns, whom he criticizes for their obsession with novelty and innovation at the expense of tradition and intellectual rigor. Swift ridicules the moderns’ preference for newness when he writes,

“Memory being an employment of the mind upon things past, is a faculty for which the learned in our illustrious age have no manner of occasion, who deal entirely with invention.”

He suggests that modern writers have become so focused on being inventive that they have abandoned the valuable lessons of the past. Swift’s critique here is not merely about innovation, but about the reckless disregard for tradition that often accompanies the pursuit of originality.

Section 7 continues this critique by praising the value of digressions, an ironic celebration of digressive writing styles that were fashionable at the time. Swift writes,

“Digression is the soul of wit,”

mocking writers who fill their works with unnecessary tangents in the belief that they are being clever. Through this exaggerated praise, Swift highlights the lack of coherence and depth in much modern writing, which prioritizes form over substance.

In Section 10, Swift returns to the theme of critics, ridiculing their self-importance and penchant for plagiarism. He ironically praises modern critics for “improving” upon the ancients by stealing their ideas and claiming them as original. Swift’s tone here is biting, as he exposes the hypocrisy of modern writers and critics who elevate themselves by imitating the very works they claim to surpass.

Finally, in Section 12, Swift ties together his critiques of both writers and critics by mocking the literary marketplace itself. He satirizes how success is often determined by market forces rather than by merit. He describes how certain works are only popular under specific conditions, such as when “a hard year for turnips” leads to increased book sales . This commentary reflects Swift’s broader disdain for a literary culture that values profit and fashion over intellectual integrity.

Through 'A Tale of a Tub', Swift delivers a powerful critique of the literary landscape of his time, targeting the vanity of writers, the superficiality of critics, and the commercialization of literature. His satire remains relevant as a timeless commentary on the nature of literary production and critique.

Q.-5.|What would you say to Jonathan Swift in a letter responding to his satirical work "A Tale of a Tub"?

Ans.

Q.-6.|How does Swift use satire to mock the reading habits of his audience? Discuss with reference to A Tale of a Tub.

Ans.

In 'A Tale of a Tub', Jonathan Swift uses satire to mock the reading habits of his audience, critiquing both their superficial engagement with texts and their susceptibility to literary trends. His sharp wit is evident from the very beginning, notably in the "Preface," where Swift ridicules readers for skimming over prefatory material, despite the fact that prefaces often serve as a "bill of fare" for the book. Swift notes how modern readers yawn and skim through forty or fifty pages of preface, not realizing that many

"proceed critics and wits by reading nothing else."

Here, Swift is poking fun at readers who believe they can grasp the essence of a book by focusing on the secondary elements while neglecting the main content.

In Section 1, Swift continues this critique, mocking readers' desire to stand out in a crowd by chasing after every new literary fad. He writes,

"Whoever has an ambition to be heard in a crowd must press, and squeeze, and thrust."

This metaphor, drawn from public life, suggests that readers, like those who push through crowds for attention, seek superficial knowledge from fashionable books rather than deep understanding. Swift's irony highlights the hollowness of these pursuits, as readers clamor for new content without considering its quality or relevance.

Swift deepens his satire in Section 10, where he humorously discusses the “modern way” of reading, which involves mastering the index rather than engaging with the full text. He writes that the

“most accomplished way of using books”

is either to

"serve them as some men do lords, learn their titles exactly, and then brag of their acquaintance,"

or to gain insight by thoroughly mastering the index. This critique reflects Swift’s disdain for readers who believe they can understand complex works through shortcuts, such as reading only summaries or indices, rather than grappling with the full substance of a text.

Section 11 expands on this theme by addressing how readers are influenced by their environment and personal circumstances. Swift humorously advises readers to adopt the conditions under which the author wrote, claiming that many “bright passages” of his work were conceived “in bed in a garret” and composed during periods of hunger and financial distress. This passage satirizes readers’ attempts to relate to the author's experiences, as if mimicking an author's personal struggles would help them better comprehend the work. Swift suggests that this approach is absurd, further mocking the superficiality of readers who seek shortcuts to deeper understanding.

In the conclusion, Swift returns to his mockery of readers' obsession with trends and external conditions, noting that certain works only succeed under specific circumstances, such as a “hard year for turnips.” By tying the success of books to arbitrary factors like agricultural conditions, Swift satirizes the way readers and publishers prioritize marketability and timing over literary merit.

Through these examples, Swift critiques his contemporary audience's shallow reading habits, emphasizing how they prioritize novelty and convenience over true intellectual engagement. His satire remains relevant today, challenging readers to reflect on how they approach literature and whether they truly engage with the ideas and arguments presented.

References:

1. Abigail Williams, and Kate O’Connor. “Jonathan Swift and ‘A Tale of a Tub.’” Great Writers Inspire, 4 July 2012, writersinspire.org/content/jonathan-swift-tale-tub. Accessed 22 Sept. 2024.

2. Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. “A Tale of a Tub.” Encyclopedia Britannica, 2 Nov. 2022, www.britannica.com/topic/A-Tale-of-a-Tub-prose-satire-by-Swift. Accessed 22 Sept. 2024.

3. Swift, Jonathan. A Tale of a Tub. True Sign Publishing House Private Limited, 2023.

 Thank you!