The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald
This blog is written as a task assigned by the head of the Department of
English (MKBU), Prof. and Dr. Dilip Barad Sir. Here is the link to the
professor's research article for background reading: Click here.
Here is the link to the blog: Click here.
{getToc} $title={Table of Contents} $count={false}
| The Great Gatsby | |
known as Celestial Eyes |
|
| Author | F. Scott Fitzgerald |
| Cover artist | Francis Cugat |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Tragedy |
| Published | April 10, 1925 |
| Publisher | Charles Scribner's Sons |
| Publication place | United States |
| Media type | Print (hardcover & paperback) |
| Preceded by | The Beautiful and Damned (1922) |
| Followed by | Tender Is the Night (1934) |
| Text | The Great Gatsby at Wikisource |
Q.-1.|Read the article on the Book cover art and its connection to the novel's themes - and write your understanding of the symbolic significance of the book cover.
Ans.
1. Overview
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s 'The Great Gatsby' is as much a visual and cultural
phenomenon as it is a literary masterpiece. The iconic cover art, designed by
Francis Cugat, know as Celestial Eyes, has come to embody the novel’s complex
interplay of beauty, despair, wealth, and moral decay. This answer explores
the symbolic significance of the book cover in relation to the themes of the
novel, arguing that Cugat’s imagery not only captures the essence of the Jazz
Age but also serves as a visual commentary on the moral and existential
dilemmas faced by its characters. By examining the symbolic elements—most
notably the disembodied eyes, the reclining female nudes within the irises,
and the deliberate use of color—we gain a deeper understanding of the
narrative’s rich subtext and Fitzgerald’s deliberate interplay between text
and image.
2. Introduction
'The Great Gatsby' is renowned not only for its narrative of aspiration,
disillusionment, and decadence but also for its striking cover art, which has
been hailed as—
"the most celebrated and widely disseminated jacket art in twentieth-century American literature, and perhaps of all time."(SCRIBNER)
Francis Cugat’s design, with its hypnotic, sad eyes and symbolic motifs,
invites readers to explore the duality of beauty and decay—a central paradox
in Fitzgerald’s work. This answer will dissect the various components of the
cover art and relate them to the novel’s exploration of themes such as the
failure of the American Dream, the superficiality of wealth, and the
inescapable moral gaze that pervades the narrative.
3. Iconic Status and Artistic Innovation
3.1. Celebrated Imagery in American Literary Culture
The cover art for 'The Great Gatsby' is not merely a decorative element but a
powerful symbol embedded in American cultural consciousness. As noted by
SCRIBNER,
"Francis Cugat's painting for F. Scott Fitzgerald's 'The Great Gatsby' is the most celebrated and widely disseminated jacket art in twentieth-century American literature."(SCRIBNER)
This iconic status stems from its innovative departure from literal
illustration to a more abstract, symbolic representation of the novel’s core
themes. Unlike conventional book covers that attempt to summarize the
narrative visually, Cugat’s artwork transcends mere depiction by engaging with
the metaphysical and moral dimensions of the text.
3.2. From Illustrative to Symbolic Art
Cugat’s approach to the cover was revolutionary; his rendition is—
"not illustrative, but symbolic, even iconic."(SCRIBNER)
This transformation from illustration to symbolism is crucial because it
mirrors the dual nature of the Jazz Age itself—a time of outward glamour
intertwined with inner desolation and moral ambiguity. The cover does not
simply recount the events of the novel but rather encapsulates the emotional
and philosophical landscape that Fitzgerald seeks to portray. The abstract
nature of the artwork invites multiple interpretations, each reflecting the
complexity of the novel’s narrative and the layered identity of its
characters.
4. The Eyes: A Window to Moral Judgment
4.1. The Dominance of the Disembodied Eyes
The most striking feature of Cugat’s cover art is undoubtedly the pair of
disembodied eyes. These—
“sad, hypnotic, heavily outlined eyes” beam like “headlights through a cobalt night sky”(SCRIBNER)
—and they have been interpreted in various ways. Some critics view these eyes
as representing God, others see them as a nod to Dr. T.J. Eckleburg’s
billboard in the novel, and yet others regard them as the all-seeing gaze of
society. The ambiguity surrounding their symbolic identity is itself a
reflection of the moral ambiguity permeating the novel.
4.2. The Eyes as a Moral Arbiter
In the context of 'The Great Gatsby,' the eyes suggest an omnipresent force of
judgment. They seem to watch over the characters, particularly Gatsby and
Daisy, as they navigate a world marked by hedonistic excess and moral decay.
This pervasive gaze can be seen as a manifestation of the "invisible hand" of
fate or the societal forces that condemn the characters’ transgressions. The
idea that these eyes serve as a moral arbiter is reinforced by Nick Carraway’s
own observations; he describes Daisy as—
"girl whose disembodied face floated along the dark cornices and blinding signs"(Fitzgerald)
The visual echo of this description in the cover art reinforces the notion
that the characters’ actions are subject to constant, albeit abstract,
scrutiny.
4.3. The Psychological Impact of Being Watched
The cover art’s haunting eyes also invite readers to reflect on the
psychological burden of being constantly observed. In a society driven by
appearances and social expectations, the sensation of being perpetually under
watch becomes a metaphor for the internalized guilt and disillusionment
experienced by the characters. This interpretation aligns with the overarching
themes of the novel, where external glamour belies an inner emptiness and
moral decay. The eyes, in this light, serve as both a literal and figurative
mirror, reflecting the soul of the Jazz Age—a society in which the pursuit of
wealth and pleasure is inextricably linked to inevitable sorrow and regret.
5. Reclining Female Nudes: Symbolism Within the Eyes
5.1. The Enigmatic Presence of the Reclining Figures
Within the irises of the dominant eyes, viewers can discern the subtle yet
provocative imagery of reclining female nudes. According to SCRIBNER,—
"their irises are transfigured into reclining female nudes"(SCRIBNER)
This incorporation of human figures within the abstract form of the eyes
introduces an additional layer of complexity. The nudes symbolize the sensual
and often objectified nature of beauty during the Jazz Age. They serve as a
reminder of the transient, often superficial allure that captivates the
characters, particularly Gatsby’s fixation on Daisy—a figure who embodies both
desire and disillusionment.
5.2. Intersection of Sensuality and Vulnerability
The portrayal of female nudes within the eyes can be interpreted as a metaphor
for the dual nature of desire in the novel. On one hand, the nudes evoke the
sensual, almost divine beauty that the characters chase; on the other, they
hint at the vulnerability and objectification that underpins such allure.
Daisy’s character, described by Nick as having a face that was—
"sad and lovely with bright things in it, bright eyes and a bright passionate mouth"(Fitzgerald)
—encapsulates this duality. The presence of these figures within the watchful
eyes suggests that the same forces that attract and seduce also expose the
characters to criticism and judgment—a recurring motif throughout the
narrative.
5.3. The Role of the Female Form in Representing the American Dream
Moreover, the female figures can be seen as a commentary on the nature of the
American Dream. The dream, like the nudes, is an object of desire, idealized
yet ultimately elusive. The dream’s beauty is undeniable, yet its pursuit
leads to a hollow existence marked by disillusionment. By integrating the
reclining female nudes into the cover art, Cugat underscores the paradox of
the American Dream: it is both alluring and destructively deceptive.
6. The Language of Color: Blue, Green, and Yellow
6.1. The Significance of the Dark Blue Background
Color plays a crucial role in reinforcing the symbolic narrative of the cover
art. The dark blue background is particularly significant, as it conveys a
spectrum of emotions ranging from sadness and loneliness to cynicism and
despair. Barad notes that the dark blue can be interpreted as evoking—
"feelings of sadness, loneliness, and despair, which are all emotions that Jay Gatsby experiences throughout the novel."(Barad, “The Great Gatsby: Book Cover Art and Its Connection to the Novel’s Themes”)
This somber color choice reflects the underlying emptiness and futility of the
characters' pursuits, mirroring the emotional tone that permeates Fitzgerald’s
text.
6.2. The Luminous Green: A Beacon of Hope and Illusion
Intertwined with the dark blue is the element of green light, which streams
from one of the eyes. As described by SCRIBNER,
"from one of the eyes streams a green luminescent."(SCRIBNER)
This green light carries profound symbolic weight, representing Gatsby’s
hopes, dreams, and his relentless desire to recapture the past. The green
light has long been associated with the promise of a better future—a beacon
that simultaneously inspires and torments Gatsby. Yet, as the narrative
unfolds, this light becomes emblematic of the unattainable, reflecting the
disillusionment that awaits those who chase illusory dreams.
6.3. The Allure of Yellow: Wealth and Superficiality
Complementing the cool hues of blue and green is the color yellow, which
symbolizes wealth, luxury, and the superficial glitter of the Jazz Age. The
yellow color symbolizes wealth, luxury, and the superficiality of the Jazz
Age. In a society where opulence often masks moral decay, yellow becomes a
visual shorthand for the deceptive allure of materialism. It reminds readers
that behind the facade of affluence lies a void of authenticity and moral
substance—a central critique in Fitzgerald’s exploration of American society.
7. Integration with the Novel’s Themes
7.1. The Duality of Beauty and Despair
The intricate design of the cover art reflects the dual nature of 'The Great
Gatsby': beauty intertwined with decay, aspiration shadowed by
disillusionment. Cugat’s art is a visual encapsulation of the novel’s central
themes. The juxtaposition of ethereal beauty, embodied in the female forms and
luminous green light, against the bleak, somber background of deep blue
creates a tension that mirrors the internal conflict experienced by the
characters. This duality is vividly captured in the recurring motifs of
longing and loss that define the narrative.
7.2. The Interplay of Art and Narrative
One of the most fascinating aspects of the cover art is its direct connection
to the text. Fitzgerald himself acknowledged the significance of Cugat’s
imagery, noting that he had "written it into" his book (SCRIBNER). This
deliberate integration of visual and textual elements blurs the boundaries
between art forms, creating a symbiotic relationship where the cover becomes
an extension of the narrative. For instance, the image of the girl whose
disembodied face floated along the dark cornices and blinding signs finds its
visual echo in the haunting eyes that dominate the cover. This convergence
reinforces the idea that the themes of the novel are not confined to its words
but are embodied in its very presentation.
7.3. Commentary on the American Dream
The symbolism embedded in the cover art serves as a microcosm of the novel’s
broader social critique. The eyes, the nudes, and the interplay of color all
speak to the pervasive disillusionment with the American Dream. The dream,
once heralded as a promise of boundless opportunity and prosperity, is
rendered hollow by the very forces of greed, superficiality, and moral
ambiguity that the cover art so eloquently portrays. The cover’s evocative
imagery prompts readers to question the veracity of the dream—a theme that
resonates deeply within the narrative and offers a timeless critique of modern
society.
8. The Confluence of Art and Cultural Memory
8.1. Collaboration Between Author and Artist
The unique collaboration between Fitzgerald and Cugat is a testament to the
interdisciplinary nature of literary art. The mutual influence is evident:
while the cover art amplifies the novel’s themes, the text in turn validates
the imagery. It illustrates how literary works can transcend their textual
confines to become holistic cultural artifacts.
8.2. The Enduring Legacy of the Cover Art
Cugat’s design has achieved a legacy that extends far beyond its initial
publication. Its ability to capture the zeitgeist of the Jazz Age while
engaging with enduring questions of morality and desire has cemented its
status as an iconic piece of American art. The cover art not only invites
readers to delve deeper into the narrative but also serves as a reminder of
the transformative power of art. In its symbolic complexity, the cover stands
as a testament to the notion that literature, like art, is a reflection of
society—a mirror that reveals the contradictions and aspirations of its time.
9. Conclusion
In examining the symbolic significance of the cover art of 'The Great Gatsby,'
we uncover a rich tapestry of imagery that parallels the novel’s exploration
of American society, desire, and moral decay. Francis Cugat’s masterpiece,
with its disembodied eyes, reclining female nudes, and carefully chosen color
palette, encapsulates the dual nature of beauty and despair that lies at the
heart of Fitzgerald’s narrative. The cover art transcends its role as a mere
decorative element, emerging instead as a powerful symbol that invites
reflection on the elusive nature of the American Dream and the inescapable
judgment of a society that prizes superficiality over substance.
By merging visual symbolism with literary narrative, the cover art becomes an
integral part of 'The Great Gatsby' experience. It reminds us that art, in all
its forms, is interwoven with the human condition—capturing our hopes, our
failures, and the relentless passage of time. As we gaze into the Celestial
Eyes that dominate the cover, we are compelled to confront the haunting truths
of a world where beauty is ephemeral, dreams are often doomed to decay, and
every pursuit carries the weight of inevitable scrutiny.
Ultimately, the cover art of 'The Great Gatsby' endures as a cultural
artifact—a visual manifestation of the timeless themes of aspiration,
disillusionment, and the ceaseless interplay between light and darkness. It
remains a profound commentary on the human condition, inviting each new
generation of readers to question, interpret, and reflect upon the intricate
dance between idealism and reality. In doing so, it secures its place not only
as an icon of American literature but also as a beacon of artistic expression
that continues to inspire and provoke thoughtful inquiry.
Q.-2.|Write about 'Understanding Jay Gatsby's character' [Watch two short videos for the ideas i.e. (i) Understanding J. Gatsby and (ii) Psychoanalytical Study - Shame (guilt) and Grief.]
Ans.
Video on Understanding J. Gatsby | The Great Gatsby (2013) | Character Analysis on YouTube/Film is just Moving Pictures: Click here.
Video on A Psychoanalysis of Jay Gatsby (The Great Gatsby) on YouTube/Emory University: Click here.
Click here to watch the full playlist on The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald on YouTube\Course Hero.
1. Overview
Jay Gatsby remains one of modern literature’s most enigmatic and studied
figures—a man whose inner life, aspirations, and contradictions have been the
subject of numerous psychoanalytical and literary analyses. In exploring
Gatsby’s character, one finds a tapestry woven with threads of grand vision,
shame-induced self-creation, grief over lost time, and the relentless pursuit
of a romanticized American Dream. This answer delves into these themes by
synthesizing insights from two short videos—(i) Understanding J. Gatsby and
(ii) Psychoanalytical Study - Shame (Guilt) and Grief—alongside critical
quotations from scholarly and primary sources. Through a detailed examination
of Gatsby’s motivations, his psychological struggles, and his ultimately
tragic flaw, this analysis seeks to illuminate how Gatsby embodies both the
hope and the hubris of his era.
2. Introduction
Jay Gatsby, the central figure of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s 'The Great Gatsby,'
stands as a symbol of both the dazzling promise and the disillusionment
inherent in the American Dream. His life is defined by an unwavering
commitment to a long-held ideal—one that is both noble and tragically flawed.
As Jared DeFife remarks,
“Gatsby he had a grand vision for his life since he was a boy; I'm gonna fix things just the way they were before—just you and me—no amount of fire could challenge the fairy tale he had stored up in his heart.”(The Great Gatsby)
This grand vision, however, is intricately intertwined with deep-seated shame
about his origins, a psychological reaction that leads him to construct an
entirely new persona. Concurrently, Gatsby’s persistent grief over the passage
of time and his fixation on reclaiming a lost past further complicate his
character, rendering him a quintessential Romantic idealist caught between
aspiration and reality.
This answer is organized into several sections: first, it provides an overview
of Gatsby’s grand vision and his pursuit of a reimagined past; next, it
examines the role of shame and reaction formation in the construction of his
persona; following that, it explores the psychological dimensions of grief and
the implications of Gatsby’s unyielding relationship with time; and finally,
it considers how these facets collectively inform our understanding of Gatsby
as both a tragic hero and a product of the American Dream.
3. Gatsby’s Grand Vision and the American Dream
3.1. The Idealized Past and the Quest for Perfection
From his earliest days, Gatsby harbored an idealized vision of life—a vision
that would come to define his every action. His longing to—
“fix things just the way they were before”(The Great Gatsby)
—underscores a deeply romantic desire to return to an earlier, purer time.
This yearning is most poignantly embodied in his relationship with Daisy
Buchanan, the woman who represents both the lost past and the promise of a
future redeemed by love. Gatsby’s fixation on Daisy is not merely about love
in the conventional sense; it is an obsession with recapturing a moment of
perfection—a time when he believed everything was possible. As Jared DeFife
notes,
“Gatsby is really trying to reclaim that lost era… when he was 17 when they met.”(DeFife)
His actions, from the extravagant parties to his meticulously crafted public
persona, all serve this singular purpose: to bridge the gap between what was
and what he hopes might be again.
3.2. The Romantic Pursuit of the American Dream
Gatsby’s quest is also emblematic of a particular interpretation of the
American Dream—a vision that is as much about personal reinvention as it is
about material success. Unlike the purely materialistic pursuits of some of
his contemporaries, Gatsby’s ambition is imbued with a creative and romantic
quality. Roberts observes,
“Gatsby may be more creative and romantic in pursuit of the American Dream than Tony because he does all for the sake of a woman rather than merely aping another man's success.”(Roberts)
This differentiation is crucial: Gatsby’s pursuit, though deeply flawed, is
inspired by an idealistic passion rather than a simple desire for wealth. His
version of the American Dream is as much about self-creation and
transformation as it is about the accumulation of wealth. His relentless drive
and visionary optimism, even in the face of insurmountable odds, position him
as a heroic figure—a quester who, despite his eventual downfall, becomes
immortalized as a “trophy” of his time (Bloom).
4. The Role of Shame and Reaction Formation in Gatsby’s Persona
4.1. The Genesis of Self-Creation
Gatsby’s transformation from James Gatz to Jay Gatsby is a powerful testament
to the impact of shame on self-identity. Born into modest circumstances,
Gatsby’s early experiences instilled in him a profound sense of inadequacy and
social inferiority. This internalized shame becomes the catalyst for a
psychological process known as reaction formation—a defense mechanism in which
an individual converts unwanted feelings into their opposites. As Jared DeFife
explains,
“Gatsby is described as a self-made man from this shame; he starts to create a persona, he changes his name, he leaves his house for the army and creates a persona of himself molded against as a reaction against the shame.”(DeFife)
In reinventing himself, Gatsby attempts to transcend the limitations of his
origin, constructing an identity that is imbued with wealth, sophistication,
and an almost mythic allure.
4.2. The Duality of Self and the Platonic Conception
Fitzgerald’s portrayal of Gatsby further reveals a character defined by a—
“Platonic conception of himself.”(Fitzgerald)
This idealized self-image is not merely a matter of external appearances or
social climbing; it represents a profound inner vision that shapes every facet
of his existence. Gatsby’s carefully curated persona is both a shield against
the shame of his past and a beacon of his aspirations. By clinging to this
ideal, Gatsby manages to maintain a sense of hope and purpose, even as the
reality of his circumstances threatens to undermine his dreams. His
self-conception is so powerful that it allows him to defy the natural
limitations imposed by time and memory, as he continuously strives to recreate
the past. In this sense, Gatsby’s persona becomes a living paradox—a blend of
vulnerability and invincibility, simultaneously authentic and constructed.
5. Grief, Lost Time, and the Quest for Immortality
5.1. The Psychological Weight of Grief
Another critical dimension of Gatsby’s character is his profound experience of
grief—a grief not solely for the loss of a person, but for the irretrievable
passage of time. Gatsby’s fixation on returning to the past is as much an
expression of mourning as it is a desire for redemption. The intense emotional
investment he places in the memory of his youth, and in the image of Daisy,
reflects a deep-seated sorrow over what has been irretrievably lost. As
Mathews notes,
“I think he would acknowledge anything now, without reserve, but he wanted to talk about Daisy”(Mathews)
—illustrating how Gatsby’s grief is inextricably linked to his idealization of
Daisy. This mourning is compounded by a sense of regret and longing—a
psychological state that renders him unable to accept the inevitable march of
time. The metaphorical significance of time in Gatsby’s narrative is
encapsulated in the famous closing lines:
“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past”(Fitzgerald)
5.2. The Illusion of Reclaiming Time
Gatsby’s desperate attempts to reclaim the past are further symbolized by his
fixation on moments frozen in time. One notable instance is his almost literal
attempt to stop time during his reunion with Daisy, when—
“he almost knocks a clock over on the mantel.”(DeFife)
This act is not merely a humorous anecdote; it is a poignant representation of
Gatsby’s desire to suspend the relentless progression of time and to live
indefinitely within the confines of an idealized moment. The green light at
the end of Daisy’s dock—an enduring symbol throughout the novel—serves as a
beacon of this illusory promise. It signifies Gatsby’s perpetual hope and the
belief that he can, somehow, arrest time and return to a state of innocence
and possibility. However, this very fixation on the past ultimately
contributes to Gatsby’s tragic flaw: his inability to adapt to the present, no
matter how bitter the reality.
6. Gatsby as a Psychoanalytical Subject
6.1. The Id, the Ego, and the Superego
From a psychoanalytical perspective, Gatsby is a fascinating study in the
interplay between the id, ego, and superego. His actions are predominantly
driven by his id—his deep-seated desires, impulses, and fantasies. The
relentless pursuit of Daisy, his opulent parties, and his dramatic reinvention
all reflect a man governed by primal impulses and unchecked longing. At the
same time, however, Gatsby’s carefully constructed persona and his adherence
to a rigid self-image suggest the intervention of a nascent superego—a moral
and idealistic counterweight that aspires to transcend mere hedonistic
pleasure. This dynamic tension between raw desire and the aspirational ideal
is central to understanding Gatsby’s psychological makeup. His internal
struggle between embracing his true, often messy origins and the pursuit of an
unattainable ideal renders him both tragically human and mythically heroic.
6.2. Gatsby as a Tragic Hero of Modernity
In many respects, Gatsby embodies the classic traits of a tragic hero—a figure
whose greatest strength is also his most profound vulnerability. His
unwavering commitment to a Platonic ideal, as Bloom succinctly puts it,
positions him as “that quester” whose greatness is defined by his relentless
hope (Bloom). Yet, this very quality also blinds him to the harsh realities of
his environment, ensuring that his noble quest is doomed from the start.
Gatsby’s downfall is not merely a result of external circumstances or the
corruption of the American Dream; it is also the inevitable consequence of a
self-created illusion. His tragic flaw—his refusal to surrender his dream and
confront the immutable forces of time and change—ultimately leads to his
demise, leaving behind a legacy that is as inspiring as it is cautionary.
7. The Intermediary Role of Nick Carraway
Video on The Great Gatsby: Why Nick Is Not Your Friend on YouTube/Thought & Word: Click here.
7.1. The Observer and the Confessor
No analysis of Gatsby’s character would be complete without acknowledging the
critical role played by Nick Carraway, the novel’s narrator. Nick serves as
both an insider and an outsider—an observer who is drawn into Gatsby’s orbit,
yet remains sufficiently detached to offer a measured account of his life. As
Bloom suggests,
“Nick imagines glamorous encounters but reads about banking after dinner in the Yale Club”(Bloom)
—capturing the dual nature of his involvement in the world of wealth and
superficiality. Nick’s fluctuating perspective provides readers with a nuanced
understanding of Gatsby: he admires Gatsby’s unwavering hope and visionary
ambition, even as he is repelled by the corruption and moral decay that
surround him. This duality is emblematic of the broader themes in 'The Great
Gatsby,' where glamour and despair exist side by side, and where the line
between aspiration and delusion becomes increasingly blurred.
7.2. A Mirror to Gatsby’s Inner World
Through Nick’s reflective narrative, we gain access to the inner workings of
Gatsby’s character—a world defined by contradictions and hidden depths. Nick’s
observations reveal that Gatsby is, in many ways, a product of his environment
and his own psychological struggles. The interplay between admiration and
criticism in Nick’s portrayal of Gatsby further underscores the complexity of
his character. As Nick remarks,
“There is no confusion like the confusion of a simple mind”(Fitzgerald)
—hinting at the paradox of Gatsby’s simplicity in his grand aspirations and
the convoluted path he has taken to achieve them. In this light, Nick’s dual
perspective becomes a vital interpretive tool, offering readers insight into
both the overt and the subtle aspects of Gatsby’s personality.
8. Conclusion
Jay Gatsby’s character is a rich amalgamation of dreams, desires, and internal
conflicts—a testament to both the boundless potential and the inevitable
limitations of the American Dream. His grand vision, forged in the fires of
youthful hope, propels him on a quest to recapture a lost past, while his
reaction formation against a shameful origin catalyzes the creation of an
idealized self. Simultaneously, Gatsby’s profound grief over the passage of
time and his obsessive longing for what once was underpin his every action,
rendering him a figure caught between aspiration and reality. As Bloom aptly
observes, Gatsby “sprang from his Platonic conception of himself,” a
notion that encapsulates both his greatness and his ultimate tragedy.
Gatsby’s life—marked by lavish parties, relentless ambition, and a profound
personal reinvention—illustrates the tension between the id’s unbridled
desires and the superego’s moral aspirations. This tension, along with his
fixation on a romanticized past and his inability to accept the immutable
progression of time, ensures that Gatsby remains a complex and tragic hero.
His story is a poignant reminder that the pursuit of an ideal, no matter how
noble or passionate, is fraught with inherent contradictions and dangers.
Furthermore, the role of Nick Carraway as both mediator and observer enriches
our understanding of Gatsby’s inner world. Nick’s nuanced narrative allows us
to appreciate the multifaceted nature of Gatsby’s character—a man who is at
once a visionary quester, a victim of his own psychological defenses, and a
tragic embodiment of the American Dream’s corrosive allure.
In conclusion, Jay Gatsby’s character stands as a testament to the enduring
complexities of human aspiration and identity. His life, imbued with the
fervor of a grand vision, the pain of suppressed shame, and the weight of
inexorable grief, continues to captivate and challenge readers. Gatsby’s
journey—marked by both triumph and profound sorrow—serves as a microcosm of
the broader struggles of modern existence, reminding us that the line between
hope and despair is as fine as it is inevitable. Ultimately, Gatsby’s legacy
endures as a powerful symbol of the beauty and the tragedy of a dream too
grand to be fully realized.
Q.-3.|How faithful is Luhrmann's film adaption to the original novel?
Ans.
| The Great Gatsby (2013 film) | |
 |
|
| Directed by | Baz Luhrmann |
| Screenplay by | Baz Luhrmann Craig Pearce |
| Based on | The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald |
| Produced by | Baz Luhrmann Catherine Martin Douglas Wick Lucy Fisher Catherine Knapman |
| Starring | Leonardo DiCaprio Tobey Maguire Carey Mulligan Joel Edgerton Isla Fisher Jason Clarke |
| Cinematography | Simon Duggan |
| Edited by | Matt Villa Jason Ballantine Jonathan Redmond |
| Music by | Craig Armstrong |
| Production companies |
Village Roadshow Pictures A&E Television Bazmark Productions Red Wagon Entertainment |
| Distributed by | Warner Bros. Pictures (Worldwide) Roadshow Films (Australia) |
| Release dates | May 1, 2013 (New York City) May 10, 2013 (United States) May 30, 2013 (Australia) |
| Running time | 142 minutes |
| Countries | Australia United States |
| Language | English |
| Budget | $105 million |
| Box office | $353.6 million |
The Great Gatsby (2013 film) Trailer: Click here.
1. Overview
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s 'The Great Gatsby' has long captivated readers with its
lyrical prose, evocative imagery, and incisive commentary on the American
Dream. Baz Luhrmann’s film adaptation of the novel—released in 2013—elicited
similarly impassioned responses from audiences and critics alike. The question
of faithfulness looms large: Does Luhrmann’s cinematic rendition preserve
Fitzgerald’s narrative, thematic, and stylistic intentions, or does it stray
into the realm of reinterpretation and modern spectacle? This answer explores
the film’s fidelity to the novel by examining its narrative framing, character
construction, visual realism, stylistic choices, musical interludes, and
thematic emphasis. In doing so, it assesses both the strengths and the
deviations of Luhrmann’s adaptation, providing an analytical framework for
understanding the balance between faithful recreation and innovative
reinterpretation.
2. Introduction
Baz Luhrmann’s 'The Great Gatsby' is a visual tour de force that transforms
Fitzgerald’s Jazz Age world into a vibrant cinematic experience. While some
critics argue that—
“Luhrmann might have been able to make a much better picture had he not tried so hard to be faithful to the novel”(Shumway)
—others maintain that his adherence to key textual elements preserves the
integrity of Fitzgerald’s work. This answer contends that Luhrmann’s film is
both faithful and transformative, retaining central narrative components and
language while simultaneously using visual spectacle, contemporary music, and
narrative framing to appeal to modern audiences. By engaging with a broad
range of critical perspectives, this analysis evaluates the adaptation’s
successes and shortcomings in maintaining fidelity to the original novel.
3. The Narrative Frame and Nick Carraway’s Role
3.1. Alterations in Nick’s Character
One of the most significant departures from the novel appears in the
characterization of Nick Carraway. In Fitzgerald’s text, Nick is a detached,
reflective narrator who famously claims,
“I have been drunk just twice in my life.”(Fitzgerald)
However, Luhrmann’s film immediately subverts this assertion by opening with
Nick in a sanitarium—a setting that implies a nervous breakdown or, as Barad
notes,
“diagnosed by a doctor of some sort as ‘morbidly alcoholic’”(Barad)
This recontextualization of Nick’s character is twofold in its function. On
one hand, it provides a more dynamic, conflicted protagonist who is actively
involved in the world he observes. As Shumway comments,
“Luhrmann's solution is to make Nick more involved in the world he describes, presumably to make him a more interesting character”(Shumway)
On the other hand, this narrative framing challenges the reliability of Nick’s
retrospective narration and invites viewers to question the veracity of his
accounts.
3.2. Nick as the Authorial Figure
Luhrmann further reinforces Nick’s centrality by incorporating scenes that
depict him writing, typing, and compiling his manuscript. In one particularly
inventive sequence, we witness Nick literally crafting the title of the work:
first “Gatsby,” then, with a concluding flourish, “The Great Gatsby” (Barad).
This meta-textual device underscores the idea that the novel is both a
personal account and an artistic construction—a notion already present in
Fitzgerald’s text, as evidenced by Nick’s self-identification as—
“the man who gives his name to this book.”(Barad)
Although these additions enrich the film’s narrative structure, they also
represent a departure from the subtlety of Fitzgerald’s narration. Luhrmann’s
explicit visual cues about the act of storytelling transform Nick into both
narrator and character, thereby complicating the traditional boundary between
observer and participant.
4. Visual Realism and Historical Details
4.1. Costuming, Hairstyles, and the Jazz Age Aesthetic
Luhrmann’s adaptation is often lauded for its visual splendor and meticulous
attention to the era’s aesthetic. The film’s costumes and hairstyles have been
described as—
“particularly convincing, more accurate than those in the 1974 adaptation.”(Shumway)
In recreating the opulence of the Jazz Age, Luhrmann not only pays homage to
Fitzgerald’s descriptive language but also updates these visuals to resonate
with contemporary audiences. The lavish parties, intricate set designs, and
flamboyant fashion choices all work to evoke the decadence and extravagance
that defined the Roaring Twenties.
4.2. Anachronisms in Cars and Music
Despite the overall visual fidelity, certain historical inaccuracies are
evident. As Shumway notes,
“the cars and some of the music seem like what Gatsby would have driven or listened to in 1922, but even here the details don't quite pass muster.”(Shumway)
Specific examples include Gatsby’s Duesenberg—“a 1929 model” and Tom’s blue
coupe—a “1933 Auburn” (Shumway). Similarly, only one song on the soundtrack,
“St. Louis Blues” by W. C. Handy, had actually been written by 1922 (Shumway).
These anachronisms, while minor, reveal the inherent challenges of reconciling
modern cinematic tastes with historical authenticity. In this respect,
Luhrmann’s film is both a tribute to and a reinterpretation of its source
material, blending period-specific details with modern cinematic conventions.
4.3. Spatial Presentation and Dreamlike Imagery
Luhrmann’s spatial presentation has been described as “fantastic and
dreamlike” (Shumway), an approach that further differentiates the film from
Fitzgerald’s more restrained prose. Many scenes evoke the theatricality of
Luhrmann’s earlier work, 'Moulin Rouge!,' where the audience is constantly
reminded that they are watching a performance. Gatsby’s parties, in
particular, are depicted as elaborate spectacles—complete with music, dance
performances, and crowds of spectators (Shumway). This operatic quality
introduces a layer of meta-theatricality that both celebrates and critiques
the artificiality of the Jazz Age, suggesting that what we see is as much a
show as it is a reflection of historical reality.
5. Stylistic Choices and the Use of Contemporary Music
5.1. The Role of Popular Music in a 1920s Setting
One of Luhrmann’s most controversial yet innovative decisions was the
incorporation of contemporary popular music, particularly hip-hop, into the
film’s soundtrack. Luhrmann explains that—
“he needed to find ways to communicate the story effectively to today's audience. Thus, he uses Jay Z's hip-hop music as an equivalent for the then-new jazz music”(Shumway)
—means of bridging the gap between the 1920s and the present day. This
technique is not merely a superficial update but a deliberate strategy to draw
parallels between the excesses of the Jazz Age and modern cultural dynamics.
By layering hip-hop with jazz elements, the film—
“seems to fragment and deconstruct a romanticized view of Gatsby's dream by drawing attention to its artificiality.”(MacLean)
5.2. Juxtaposing High and Low Art
Luhrmann’s adaptation preserves Fitzgerald’s ambivalence toward “high” and
“low” art—a theme that resonates throughout the novel. Luhrmann's adaptation
of Gatsby mirrors Fitzgerald's text by being, at once, both a romantic
glorification of the American Dream and an indictment of the culture that gave
rise to it. The film’s soundtrack, which contrasts edgier popular styles with
a Romantic, instrumental underscore reminiscent of the golden age of
Hollywood, underscores this duality (MacLean). The musical choices, while
anachronistic, serve to reinforce the film’s thematic concerns with excess,
social stratification, and the enduring allure of the American Dream.
6. Thematic Fidelity: Romance, Materialism, and Social Critique
6.1. Romantic Glorification Versus Social Indictment
At its core, 'The Great Gatsby' is a tale of romantic longing intertwined with
a trenchant social critique. Luhrmann’s film attempts to capture this duality
by emphasizing both the luminous beauty of Gatsby’s dream and the corrosive
underbelly of materialism and social inequality. As MacLowry asserts, Luhrmann
takes Fitzgerald’s ‘Jazz Age’ text and renders it operatic, excessive, and
modern. He essentially translates Fitzgerald’s novel into a visual language he
believes will resonate with today’s audiences (MacLowry). In doing so, the
film remains faithful to Fitzgerald’s unwavering optimism—
“the hope and possibility of the Utopian dream remains intact at the end of the novel”(MacLean)
—while also highlighting the disillusionment that lies beneath.
6.2. Preservation of Racial and Social Themes
An important aspect of fidelity concerns the film’s treatment of racial and
social themes. Luhrmann faithfully includes key passages from the novel
regarding race, such as Tom Buchanan’s endorsement of a racist book and his
diatribe about—
“intermarriage between black and white.”(Fitzgerald)
Additionally, the film visually presents scenes where wealthy Black
individuals are driven into Manhattan by white chauffeurs, thereby retaining
Fitzgerald’s complex portrayal of social hierarchies (Barad). Although these
scenes remain faithful to the text, Luhrmann’s decision to recast Meyer
Wolfsheim—by casting Amitabh Bachchan—further complicates the adaptation.
While one reviewer (David Denby) protested this decision (Barad), casting
Bachchan—
“preserves the character’s otherness while complicating the rather gruesome stereotype Fitzgerald employed.”(Barad)
This reimagining of Wolfsheim reflects a contemporary sensibility that rejects
outdated anti-Semitic caricatures while acknowledging the source material’s
problematic aspects.
7. Faithfulness Versus Creative License
7.1. Balancing Adaptation and Originality
Luhrmann’s film raises an important question for any adaptation: Must a film
remain entirely faithful to its literary source? As Shumway aptly observes,
“Filmmakers have no obligation to remain faithful to their literary sources. The best films are often those that use their sources as jumping off places for what are essentially new works”(Shumway)
In this light, Luhrmann’s decision to incorporate modern elements—such as the
narrative framing of Nick in a sanitarium and the use of contemporary
music—can be seen as creative licenses that expand rather than dilute
Fitzgerald’s themes. These alterations enable the film to resonate with a
modern audience, offering new interpretations of familiar motifs without
abandoning the novel’s essential spirit.
7.2. The Cost of Excessive Faithfulness
Some critics argue that Luhrmann’s commitment to fidelity may have hindered
the film’s potential. For instance, by strictly adhering to certain narrative
elements and language from the novel, the film sometimes risks appearing
self-consciously referential rather than organically cinematic. As Shumway
suggests,
“Ironically, Luhrmann might have been able to make a much better picture had he not tried so hard to be faithful to the novel.”(Shumway)
This critique implies that an adaptation’s strength lies not in its slavish
reproduction of source material but in its ability to transform that material
into a work that stands on its own artistic merits.
8. Critical Reception and Final Thoughts
8.1. Diverse Critical Opinions
The critical reception of Luhrmann’s 'The Great Gatsby' reflects the inherent
tension between fidelity and reinterpretation. Some critics praise the film
for its visual inventiveness, elaborate set design, and innovative musical
score, which together create an operatic, dreamlike experience. Others lament
the film’s departures from Fitzgerald’s subtleties, particularly in its
treatment of Nick’s character and its anachronistic details. Despite these
divergent opinions, there is a consensus that Luhrmann’s adaptation is a
complex, multifaceted work that both honors and reimagines its source
material.
8.2. The Enduring Legacy of Fitzgerald’s Vision
Ultimately, Luhrmann’s adaptation of 'The Great Gatsby' remains exceedingly
faithful to Fitzgerald’s novel in its thematic core. The film preserves the
romantic glorification of the American Dream, the biting critique of
materialism and social inequality, and the ambivalence between high and low
art that permeates the text (MacLean; MacLowry). At the same time, it employs
modern cinematic techniques and narrative devices—such as the sanitarium
framing, the explicit depiction of Nick’s inner turmoil, and the dynamic use
of contemporary music—to forge a connection with today’s audience.
9. Conclusion
Baz Luhrmann’s film adaptation of 'The Great Gatsby' is a study in adaptation
itself—a work that oscillates between faithful reproduction and innovative
reinterpretation. While the film adheres to the novel’s central narrative,
thematic, and stylistic elements, it also makes deliberate departures that
serve to update the story for a modern context. The reimagining of Nick
Carraway’s character, the incorporation of contemporary popular music, the
dreamlike spatial presentation, and even the calculated anachronisms in
historical detail all reflect Luhrmann’s commitment to both honoring and
revitalizing Fitzgerald’s masterpiece.
The film’s fidelity is evident in its meticulous attention to the Jazz Age’s
aesthetic and its preservation of the novel’s core critique of American
materialism and social inequality. Yet, its creative licenses—such as the
narrative frame that casts Nick as a conflicted, almost self-aware narrator,
and the strategic use of modern music to deconstruct the romanticized view of
Gatsby’s dream—demonstrate that adaptation is as much about transformation as
it is about replication. In this regard, Luhrmann’s 'The Great Gatsby' stands
as a testament to the potential of cinematic art to reinterpret literary
classics for new generations.
In evaluating Luhrmann’s film, one must therefore appreciate both its faithful
homage to Fitzgerald’s original text and its bold, imaginative
reinterpretations that render the story accessible and resonant in the
twenty-first century. The film does not merely replicate the novel; it
amplifies its emotional and thematic complexities, inviting viewers to
experience the enduring allure and inevitable tragedy of Gatsby’s world.
Whether one views the film’s modern flourishes as enhancements or
distractions, it is undeniable that Luhrmann has crafted a work that is as
multifaceted and contested as the novel itself.
Ultimately, the question of faithfulness is not a binary judgment but a
spectrum. Luhrmann’s adaptation exemplifies the challenges and possibilities
inherent in bringing a literary classic to the screen. By retaining key
textual elements—such as Nick’s reflective narration, the aesthetic richness
of the Jazz Age, and the incisive social commentary—while simultaneously
employing modern cinematic techniques and narrative innovations, the film
negotiates a delicate balance between homage and originality. In doing so, it
reaffirms the timeless relevance of Fitzgerald’s vision and illustrates the
dynamic interplay between literature and film in the ongoing reinterpretation
of the American Dream.
Q.-4.|Write a brief note on the symbolic significance of 'Green Light' and 'Billboard of The Eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckelberg.'
Ans.
Click here to watch the full playlist on The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald on YouTube\Course Hero.
1. Overview
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s 'The Great Gatsby' is renowned not only for its
sumptuous prose and vivid portrayal of the Jazz Age but also for its rich
tapestry of symbols. Among the most enduring of these are the green light at
the end of Daisy’s dock and the dilapidated billboard featuring the eyes of
Dr. T.J. Eckleburg. Although these symbols operate on different narrative
planes, together they encapsulate the tension between the allure of an
unattainable dream and the inescapable moral decay that underpins the American
society of the 1920s. This answer provides a detailed examination of the
symbolic significance of these two motifs, exploring their multiple layers of
meaning, their interrelationships, and the ways in which they contribute to
the broader themes of illusion versus reality, desire versus judgment, and
hope versus decay.
2. Introduction
At the heart of 'The Great Gatsby' lies a poignant commentary on the elusive
nature of the American Dream—a vision that promises endless possibility while
inevitably retreating into the distance. Central to this commentary are two
potent symbols: the green light and the billboard of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg’s
eyes. The green light, which hovers at the end of Daisy’s dock, is a
multifaceted emblem of Gatsby’s yearning for an idealized future, an ideal
that is perpetually just out of reach. In contrast, the billboard—the decaying
image of an optometrist’s sign—is a stark representation of a society that has
lost its moral compass, a godlike presence that silently judges the actions
and failings of the characters. As Nick Carraway muses on the inexorable pull
of the future—
“the orgiastic future that year by year recedes before us”(Fitzgerald)
—these symbols serve as constant reminders of the gap between aspiration and
reality.
This answer is organized into several sections. First, it explores the
symbolic meaning of the green light, discussing its associations with hope,
desire, and the passage of time. Next, it examines the billboard of Dr. T.J.
Eckleburg, delving into its function as a moral arbiter and its commentary on
the degradation of spiritual values in a commercialized society. Finally, the
answer considers the interplay between these two symbols, highlighting how
together they offer a comprehensive critique of the American Dream and the
cultural landscape of the 1920s.
3. The Green Light: A Beacon of Unattainable Dreams
3.1. Gatsby’s Yearning and the Illusion of Recaptured Time
The green light at the end of Daisy’s dock is arguably the most iconic symbol
in 'The Great Gatsby.' On a literal level, it is a simple beacon of light
across the water; yet, on a symbolic level, it represents Gatsby’s persistent
longing for a future in which he can reclaim the past and realize his
idealized vision of love and happiness. The green light at the end of Daisy's
dock represents Gatsby's unattainable dream of love and happiness. The green
light is always out of reach, symbolizing the elusive nature of Gatsby's
desires and the impossibility of recapturing the past. This dream is not
merely about an affair or the allure of Daisy’s beauty; it embodies the very
essence of Gatsby’s identity, his hopes, and his relentless ambition.
Gatsby’s fixation on the green light can be seen as a manifestation of his
belief in the possibility of progress and renewal—a belief that is as much
about self-reinvention as it is about recapturing a lost moment in time. The
light acts as a “go-ahead” signal, much like a traffic light that encourages
forward motion (Takeuchi). It fuels Gatsby’s conviction that he can transcend
the limitations of his origins and forge a future defined by wealth, love, and
success. Yet, this very optimism is also what renders his dream unattainable.
The green light is a siren call that symbolizes perpetual forward motion; as
soon as Gatsby moves closer, the light seems to retreat further into the
distance, mirroring the inexorable flow of time and the impossibility of
reliving the past.
3.2. The Color Green: Hope, Desire, and Perpetual Motion
The choice of the color green is itself loaded with significance. In many
cultures, green is associated with growth, renewal, and hope. In 'The Great
Gatsby,' however, green also suggests the corrosive influence of materialism
and the deceptive allure of wealth. Gatsby’s dream, represented by the green
light, is not a pure hope but is tainted by the materialistic society in which
he lives. The light serves as a constant reminder of both possibility and the
inherent corruption of that possibility. For instance, Takeuchi’s analysis
points out that—
“Gatsby’s faith in the green light and the promise of progress it seems to make”(Takeuchi)
—reflects the ambivalence of a dream that is as much about movement and change
as it is about an unreachable ideal.
Furthermore, the green light’s association with cars and their ceaseless
forward motion reinforces its symbolic role as an emblem of progress. This
continuous forward motion underscores the impossibility of halting time;
despite Gatsby’s relentless pursuit, the future remains perpetually receding,
leaving his dreams in a state of eternal suspension. Nick Carraway’s
reflection on this elusive promise—
“the orgiastic future that year by year recedes before us”(Fitzgerald)
—captures the bittersweet nature of hope in the modern world, where desire is
constantly undermined by the passage of time.
3.3. The Green Light as a Symbol of Illusion Versus Reality
The green light is not only a beacon of hope but also a stark reminder of the
gap between illusion and reality. Gatsby’s idealized vision of Daisy and the
world she represents is in constant conflict with the harsh truths of his
existence. His unwavering belief in the possibility of reclaiming an idyllic
past is, in many ways, a self-delusion—a mirage that obscures the brutal
realities of class, time, and human imperfection. The light, always visible
yet forever unattainable, encapsulates this tension between what is imagined
and what is real. As Burnam suggests, the symbol—
“stands for what Nick Carraway says it stands for,”(Burnam)
—an idea that encapsulates both the promise and the inherent futility of the
dream. Thus, the green light ultimately becomes a powerful metaphor for the
human condition itself: the eternal pursuit of an ideal that remains just out
of reach.
4. The Billboard of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg: The All-Seeing Eyes of Judgment
4.1. A Faded Image of Divine Oversight
In stark contrast to the personal, internalized symbol of the green light, the
billboard of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg’s eyes functions as a pervasive, external
symbol of judgment and moral decay. As described in the novel—
“But above the gray land and the spasms of bleak dust which drift endlessly over it, you perceive, after a moment, the eyes of Doctor T. J. Eckleburg”(Fitzgerald)
—the billboard dominates the desolate landscape of the Valley of Ashes. It is
an image that looms large over the moral wasteland created by rampant
commercialism and societal decay. Unlike the green light, which is a private
beacon of hope, the eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg are public and omnipresent,
serving as a kind of divine or cosmic surveillance.
4.2. The Eyes as a Moral Arbiter
The eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg carry an almost godlike quality, symbolizing an
unblinking moral judgment that watches over the characters’ actions. As
Samuels asserts,
“the eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg: the sign for an oculist's business which was never opened, the symbol of a blindness which can never be corrected.”(Samuels)
This imagery suggests that while the billboard might once have represented a
commercial enterprise, its current state reflects a broader loss of spiritual
values in society—a blindness to true morality and the degradation of ethical
consciousness. In a world where materialism has supplanted spiritual
fulfillment, the eyes serve as a silent witness to the characters’
transgressions. Wilson’s interpretation—that these eyes are reminiscent of
God’s omniscient gaze—further underscores their function as an instrument of
judgment, a moral compass that remains unyielding even as the society around
it crumbles.
4.3. The Eyes and the Theme of Moral Decay
Beyond their function as a moral arbiter, the billboard eyes also symbolize
the erosion of spiritual values in the wake of rampant industrialization and
consumerism. The desolation of the Valley of Ashes—where the billboard is
situated—stands as a grim counterpoint to the glittering opulence of West Egg
and East Egg. In this setting, the billboard’s faded, watchful eyes are a
stark reminder of a society that has lost its way, where the pursuit of wealth
has led to moral and ethical bankruptcy. The eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg thus
not only cast judgment on the characters but also on the very society that
produced them, highlighting the pervasive sense of disillusionment and decay
that permeates the novel.
4.4. The Eyes as a Signifier of Perpetual Judgment
The symbolism of the billboard is further enriched by its function as an
ever-present observer—a constant reminder that all actions, no matter how
hidden, are subject to scrutiny. This sense of perpetual judgment is
encapsulated in the cry,
“God knows what you've been doing, everything you've been doing. You may fool me, but you can't fool God!”(Fitzgerald)
Here, the eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg transcend their mundane origins as an
advertisement for an optometrist’s business; they become a metaphor for the
inescapable nature of divine accountability. In this light, the billboard
symbolizes not only the external forces of social judgment but also the
internal moral reckoning that haunts the characters—especially those who dare
to pursue their dreams at the expense of ethical integrity.
5. The Interrelationship Between the Green Light and the Billboard
5.1. Contrasting Internal Desire and External Judgment
Although the green light and the billboard of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg operate on
different symbolic levels, they are inextricably linked by their exploration
of sight, perception, and the gap between appearance and reality. The green
light is a symbol of Gatsby’s internal yearning—his personal, almost obsessive
hope that the past can be recaptured and that his dreams can become reality.
In contrast, the billboard represents an external force, a judgmental presence
that watches over and critiques the actions of the characters. Together, these
symbols illustrate a fundamental tension in the novel: the conflict between
personal aspiration and the harsh, indifferent judgment of the external world.
5.2. Illusion Versus Reality
Both symbols contribute to Fitzgerald’s broader meditation on the nature of
illusion versus reality. The green light, with its promise of a radiant, yet
unreachable future, embodies the power of dreams and the seductive allure of
an ideal that is never fully attainable. Meanwhile, the billboard’s decaying
visage serves as a sobering counterpoint—a reminder that beneath the veneer of
hope lies the inescapable truth of moral decay and societal disintegration.
This dichotomy is central to the narrative of 'The Great Gatsby,' where the
pursuit of an idealized past or future is invariably tempered by the realities
of human imperfection and ethical compromise.
5.3. The Duality of Sight and Perception
Both the green light and the billboard also evoke the theme of sight—what is
seen, what is desired, and what is ultimately judged. Gatsby’s gaze is fixed
on the green light, a beacon that directs his ambitions and fuels his desire.
Conversely, the ever-watchful eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg seem to perceive all,
serving as an unblinking reminder of the consequences of that desire. In this
sense, the green light and the billboard operate as complementary symbols: one
represents the visionary aspect of human aspiration, while the other embodies
the critical, often harsh, scrutiny of the external world.
6. Conclusion
In 'The Great Gatsby,' the green light and the billboard of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg
stand as two of the novel’s most potent symbols—each imbued with multiple
layers of meaning that illuminate the complex interplay between hope, desire,
judgment, and decay. The green light, with its connotations of unattainable
dreams and the relentless passage of time, encapsulates Gatsby’s personal
yearning to reclaim a lost past and to forge a future defined by idealized
love and success. It serves as a metaphor for the ceaseless drive for
progress—a drive that is both inspiring and ultimately futile. In contrast,
the billboard of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg, with its faded, omnipresent gaze,
symbolizes the external judgment of a society that has forsaken its moral
compass in favor of material excess and commercial gain. It casts an
unyielding light on the characters’ sins and the pervasive spiritual blindness
that characterizes the modern world.
When considered together, these symbols offer a comprehensive critique of the
American Dream and the human condition. They highlight the inherent tension
between the inner world of personal aspiration and the external forces of
moral accountability. While Gatsby’s green light beckons him toward an elusive
promise—a future that recedes ever further with each passing moment—the
watchful eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg serve as a constant reminder of the
ethical and existential costs of that pursuit.
Ultimately, the green light and the billboard are not merely decorative motifs
but are central to understanding the thematic heart of 'The Great Gatsby.'
They remind readers that the allure of a perfect future is invariably shadowed
by the harsh realities of time, decay, and judgment. In a world where dreams
are as ephemeral as they are enticing, Fitzgerald’s symbols continue to
resonate, challenging us to confront the gap between what we desire and the
consequences of our striving. As Nick Carraway reflects on the relentless pull
of the future, we are left to ponder the ultimate question: Can the human
spirit ever truly reconcile the ideal with the real, or is it doomed to chase
a light that remains forever out of reach?
In this way, the symbolic significance of the green light and the billboard of
Dr. T.J. Eckleburg endures as a testament to the complexity of aspiration and
the inexorable passage of time—a duality that continues to fascinate and
provoke thought in readers and scholars alike.
Q.-5.|Write a brief note on the theme of 'The American Dream' and 'Class Conflict' in the novel.
Ans.
Click here to watch the full playlist on The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald on YouTube\Course Hero.
1. Overview
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s 'The Great Gatsby' is a novel that continues to
captivate readers and scholars alike through its incisive exploration of
themes that remain relevant in contemporary society. Among its most potent
themes are the corrupted nature of the American Dream and the entrenched class
conflict that defines the social landscape of 1920s America. This answer
examines these themes in detail, analyzing how Fitzgerald uses characters,
symbols, and narrative structure to critique a society driven by materialism
and rigid social hierarchies. By focusing on Gatsby’s personal journey and the
broader societal implications of wealth and class, this answer elucidates how
the novel portrays both the promise and the pitfalls of the American Dream.
2. Introduction
At its core, 'The Great Gatsby' is a study of the American Dream—the ideal
that hard work, ambition, and perseverance can lead to success, happiness, and
upward social mobility. However, Fitzgerald’s portrayal is far from an
endorsement of this vision; instead, he exposes the dream’s inherent
corruption by revealing how it is distorted by materialism and the relentless
pursuit of wealth. Concurrently, the novel delves into the pervasive class
conflict that characterizes American society, particularly the stark division
between old money and the nouveau riche. Through characters such as Jay
Gatsby, Tom Buchanan, and Nick Carraway, Fitzgerald interrogates the nature of
social mobility, the illusion of self-made success, and the moral decay that
underpins the upper echelons of society. This answer unpacks these themes by
exploring key narrative elements, symbolic imagery, and critical perspectives
on the interrelationship between the American Dream and class conflict.
3. The Corruption of the American Dream
3.1. Gatsby’s Idealism and the Pursuit of Love
Jay Gatsby is often seen as the personification of the American Dream—a
self-made man who rises from humble beginnings to achieve immense wealth and
social standing. His dream, however, is not one of financial success alone; it
is inextricably linked to his idealized vision of Daisy Buchanan and the
possibility of recapturing a lost past. As MacLean notes,
“Gatsby's dream of rising out of the poverty of his childhood and securing wealth and social standing in order to attain Daisy's love is a romantic, Utopian dream—one that is often read as a representation of the American Dream.”(MacLean)
Gatsby’s pursuit is emblematic of the belief that one can reinvent oneself and
rewrite the rules of social destiny. Yet, this dream is marred by its very
nature: the relentless chase after an illusion that ultimately proves
unattainable.
3.2. Materialism and the Distortion of Ambition
Fitzgerald is keenly aware of the way in which the American Dream has been
subverted by a culture of materialism. Gatsby’s opulent parties, his lavish
mansion, and his ostentatious displays of wealth are not symbols of noble
achievement; rather, they underscore the superficiality of a dream built on
the accumulation of money and social status. As Mathews observes,
“Fitzgerald exposes this corruption of dream with Gatsby’s projection, which symbolises the vulgar pursuit of wealth and social privilege”(Mathews)
In this context, the American Dream becomes a hollow promise—a utopian ideal
reduced to the mere acquisition of luxury and the relentless desire to
impress, rather than a genuine opportunity for self-fulfillment and personal
growth.
3.3. The Green Light: A Symbol of Unfulfilled Promise
Integral to understanding the corrupted nature of the American Dream in the
novel is the symbol of the green light. Positioned at the end of Daisy’s dock,
the green light represents Gatsby’s hopes and dreams, a beacon that is forever
out of reach. It signifies the possibility of a future that remains
tantalizingly elusive, encapsulating both the allure and the inherent futility
of his aspirations. In this way, the green light becomes a powerful metaphor
for the American Dream itself—a vision that promises endless possibility while
simultaneously highlighting the insurmountable gap between aspiration and
reality. Gatsby’s fixation on this light underscores his inability to move
beyond the past, trapping him in a cycle of longing and disappointment.
4. Class Conflict and the Rigid Social Hierarchy
4.1. The Divide Between Old Money and Nouveau Riche
One of the central conflicts in 'The Great Gatsby' is the tension between the
established aristocracy of East Egg and the newly wealthy residents of West
Egg. This division is more than a mere geographical distinction; it represents
a deep-seated social hierarchy where class and pedigree dictate one’s access
to power and privilege. Tom Buchanan, the epitome of old money, embodies the
arrogance and entitlement of the established elite. His dismissive attitude
toward those who do not share his background is encapsulated in his assertion
that—
“the very rich . . . are different from you and me. They possess and enjoy early, and it does something to them, makes them soft where we are hard, and cynical where we are trustful . . . They think, deep in their hearts, that they are better than we are.”(Shumway)
This statement reflects a broader societal belief that wealth and lineage are
markers of superiority—a perspective that undergirds the social exclusion
experienced by characters like Gatsby.
4.2. The Illusion of Social Mobility
Despite the promise of the American Dream, Fitzgerald demonstrates that social
mobility is more myth than reality. Gatsby’s transformation from James Gatz to
Jay Gatsby is a remarkable feat of self-invention, yet it does not grant him
true acceptance among the elite. His newfound wealth, while impressive in its
own right, fails to erase the stain of his lower-class origins. The character
of Gatsby serves as a poignant illustration of the limitations inherent in the
pursuit of upward mobility. Even as he amasses a fortune and constructs an
identity that exudes charm and sophistication, he remains an outsider in the
eyes of the established aristocracy. This exclusion is a powerful indictment
of a society that valorizes wealth while simultaneously denying that wealth
the power to bridge the gap between classes.
4.3. Class Conflict and the Spectacle of Wealth
Fitzgerald uses the extravagance of Gatsby’s parties and the opulence of his
lifestyle as a means of critiquing the superficiality and moral bankruptcy of
the wealthy class. The grand spectacle of wealth is depicted with a sense of
both awe and revulsion; it is alluring and impressive on the surface but
ultimately reveals a vacuous, empty existence beneath. This duality is
encapsulated in the behavior of characters like Tom and Daisy Buchanan, whose
careless attitudes and destructive actions underscore the moral decay that
accompanies their privilege. The lavish parties, replete with music, dancing,
and excess, are symbolic of a society that has lost touch with genuine human
values, substituting them with a relentless pursuit of pleasure and material
gratification. In this context, the spectacle of wealth becomes both a
seduction and a condemnation—a representation of the distorted values that lie
at the heart of the American Dream.
5. Gatsby’s Personal Journey and the Myth of Self-Made Success
5.1. The Self-Made Man and the Tragedy of Illusion
Jay Gatsby’s life is emblematic of the self-made man, a figure who reinvents
himself in pursuit of an idealized version of success. His rise from poverty
to immense wealth is a testament to his ambition and determination, qualities
that lie at the core of the American Dream. Yet, this journey is fraught with
irony and tragedy. Gatsby’s success, rather than serving as a beacon of hope,
becomes a cautionary tale about the perils of pursuing an illusion. His
relentless quest to win back Daisy’s love is driven by a romantic idealism
that is ultimately doomed by the realities of social stratification and
personal limitations. As Roberts contends,
“Gatsby may be more creative and romantic in pursuit of the American Dream than Tony because he does all for the sake of a woman rather than merely aping another man's success.”(Roberts)
Here, Gatsby’s ambition is both his greatest strength and his fatal flaw,
illustrating the inherent contradictions of a dream that is built on both hope
and disillusionment.
5.2. The Role of Wealth in Shaping Identity
Gatsby’s transformation from a penniless youth into a figure of wealth and
sophistication is emblematic of the complex interplay between money and
identity in the novel. His extravagant displays of wealth, including his
ostentatious mansion and sumptuous parties, are designed not only to attract
Daisy but also to secure his place within a social order that remains forever
out of his reach. Despite his financial success, Gatsby’s inner identity
remains tethered to his humble origins—a fact that continuously undermines his
efforts to be accepted by the established elite. This tension between
self-invention and social acceptance underscores the broader critique of the
American Dream: no amount of wealth or ambition can fully erase the imprints
of one’s origins, nor can it guarantee true integration into a rigid class
structure.
5.3. The Inescapable Legacy of the Past
A recurring theme in 'The Great Gatsby' is the impossibility of recapturing
the past. Gatsby’s fixation on recreating his lost romance with Daisy is
emblematic of a broader human tendency to idealize bygone eras. His longing to
return to a time when possibilities seemed endless is symbolized by the
ever-elusive green light—a beacon of hope that remains perpetually out of
reach. This theme resonates deeply with the corrupted American Dream,
suggesting that the promise of a perfect future is inherently flawed because
it is built on the nostalgia of an unattainable past. Gatsby’s tragic
downfall, therefore, is not merely a personal failure but a broader commentary
on the futility of striving for an ideal that exists only in memory and
imagination.
6. The Intersection of Class, Race, and Social Inequality
6.1. Racial Underpinnings and Social Hierarchy
While class conflict is a dominant theme in 'The Great Gatsby,' Fitzgerald
also weaves in the subtleties of race and ethnicity as factors that reinforce
social divisions. The novel reflects the anxieties of its time, particularly
regarding the assimilation of immigrants and the perceived threat of racial
miscegenation. As Goldsmith observes,
“For both Tom and Nick, racial miscegenation and immigrant ethnic assimilation provide models of identity formation and upward mobility more easily comprehensible than the amalgam of commerce, love, and ambition underlying Gatsby’s rise.”(Goldsmith)
This perspective underscores the complex interplay between race and class,
suggesting that social acceptance is contingent not only on economic success
but also on the maintenance of certain cultural and racial boundaries.
6.2. The Burden of the “Little Man”
Fitzgerald’s exploration of class conflict extends beyond the lives of the
wealthy elite to include the experiences of the “little man,” or those who
remain permanently disenfranchised by the vast inequalities of wealth.
Although the novel primarily focuses on the lives of the rich and the nouveau
riche, its underlying critique of social stratification speaks to a broader
commentary on American society. Goldsmith’s observation that—
“the novel's earlier, more palpable engagement with the interweaving of the 'mystique of wealth' with 'class and color' lay too deeply buried in manuscript material and dense cultural allusions for the 'little man's' excavation”(Goldsmith)
—points to the inherent difficulties faced by those who lack the advantages of
wealth and pedigree. This dynamic further complicates the narrative, as it
suggests that the corruption of the American Dream is not confined solely to
the upper classes but has far-reaching implications for society as a whole.
7. The Spectacle of Wealth and Moral Decay
7.1. The Careless Rich and Their Impact
The characters of Tom and Daisy Buchanan epitomize the moral decay that
accompanies inherited wealth. Their callous disregard for the consequences of
their actions, as well as their superficial engagement with the world around
them, serves as a stark contrast to Gatsby’s earnest—but ultimately
doomed—aspiration. Tom’s elitist views and disdain for those outside his
social circle are encapsulated in his assertion about the inherent differences
between “the very rich” and the rest of society (Shumway). This attitude not
only reinforces the existing class divide but also highlights the ethical void
that characterizes the established upper class. Their behavior—marked by
irresponsibility, cruelty, and a lack of accountability—underscores
Fitzgerald’s scathing critique of a society that prizes wealth over virtue.
7.2. The Opulence and Emptiness of Gatsby’s Parties
The lavish parties hosted by Gatsby are a microcosm of the excess and
superficiality that define the Jazz Age. These grand spectacles, filled with
extravagant displays of wealth, seductive music, and fleeting encounters,
epitomize the allure of the American Dream while simultaneously revealing its
inherent emptiness. Despite the glamour and festivity, these gatherings are
devoid of genuine human connection; they are staged events designed to impress
and distract. This duality—between outward splendor and inner hollowness—is a
recurring motif in the novel and serves as a powerful indictment of a society
that has lost its moral bearings in the pursuit of material success.
8. Conclusion
Fitzgerald’s 'The Great Gatsby' offers a profound and multifaceted critique of
the American Dream and the social stratifications that define early
twentieth-century America. Through the tragic figure of Jay Gatsby, the novel
interrogates the possibility of upward mobility in a society where wealth,
class, and race create formidable barriers to true acceptance and fulfillment.
Gatsby’s romantic idealism, his desperate pursuit of an unattainable past, and
his eventual downfall all serve as poignant reminders of the corruption
inherent in a dream that has been diluted by materialism and social
inequality.
At the same time, the stark contrasts between characters—whether it be the
entrenched old money of East Egg or the aspirational nouveau riche of West
Egg—highlight the rigid class conflict that permeates the novel. The careless,
morally bankrupt behavior of the established elite, embodied by characters
like Tom and Daisy Buchanan, stands in stark opposition to Gatsby’s passionate
yet ill-fated quest for a better life. This dynamic underscores Fitzgerald’s
assertion that the American Dream, rather than being a beacon of hope, is in
fact a distorted vision—one that is intrinsically tied to the pursuit of
wealth and the maintenance of rigid social hierarchies.
In examining the interplay between the corrupted American Dream and class
conflict, it becomes clear that 'The Great Gatsby' is not simply a romantic
narrative about love and loss; it is a critical commentary on the broader
societal forces that shape human destiny. Through its vivid characters,
symbolic imagery, and incisive social critique, the novel challenges readers
to reconsider the true cost of pursuing a dream that is, by its very nature,
elusive and ultimately destructive.
Fitzgerald’s exploration of these themes continues to resonate because it
speaks to the universal human experience—the desire to rise above one’s
circumstances, the relentless pursuit of an idealized future, and the painful
recognition that some barriers, whether they be of class, race, or inherited
privilege, may never be overcome. As such, 'The Great Gatsby' endures as a
timeless work, offering both a celebration of human ambition and a somber
reflection on its inevitable limitations.
Additional Resources:
Video on F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby summary on YouTube/VideoSparkNotes: Click here.
Video on The Great Gatsby - Book Summary on YouTube/GradeSaver: Click here.
Click here to watch the full playlist on The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald on YouTube\Course Hero.
Video on F. Scott Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby (ENG) on YouTube/Vidya-mitra: Click here.
References:
1. Barad, Dilip. “Great Gatsby.” Dilip Barad | Teacher Blog, 14 June 2021,
blog.dilipbarad.com/2021/06/great-gatsby.html. Accessed 4 Feb. 2025.
2. ---. “The Great Gatsby: Book Cover Art and Its Connection to the Novel’s
Themes.” ResearchGate, Feb. 2024,
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19047.21921.
3. Bloom, Harold. F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby. Chelsea House, 2010.
4. Burnam, Tom. “The Eyes of Dr. Eckleburg: A Re-Examination of ‘The Great
Gatsby.’” College English, vol. 14, no. 1, 1952, pp. 7–12. JSTOR,
doi.org/10.2307/371821.
5. Callahan, John F. “F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Evolving American Dream: The
‘Pursuit of Happiness’ in Gatsby, Tender Is the Night, and The Last Tycoon.”
Twentieth Century Literature, vol. 42, no. 3, 1996, pp. 374–95. JSTOR,
doi.org/10.2307/441769.
6. DeFife, Jared. “A Psychoanalysis of Jay Gatsby (The Great Gatsby).”
YouTube, uploaded by Emory University, 8 May 2013,
youtu.be/mId34ZoOilA. Accessed 4 Feb. 2025.
7. Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. Project Gutenberg, 2021,
www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/64317/pg64317-images.html.
8. Goldsmith, Meredith. “WHITE SKIN, WHITE MASK: PASSING, POSING, AND
PERFORMING IN ‘THE GREAT GATSBY.’” Modern Fiction Studies, vol. 49, no. 3,
2003, pp. 443–68. JSTOR,
www.jstor.org/stable/26286297.
9. The Great Gatsby. Directed by Baz Luhrmann, Warner Bros., 2013.
10. MacLean, Tessa. “PRESERVING UTOPIA: MUSICAL STYLE IN BAZ LUHRMANN’S ‘THE
GREAT GATSBY.’” Literature/Film Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 2, 2016, pp. 120–31.
JSTOR,
www.jstor.org/stable/45037963.
11. MacLowry, Seth. “THE EXCESS OF BAZ LUHRMANN: TEACHING ‘THE GREAT GATSBY’
IN THE HIGH SCHOOL CLASSROOM.” The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive
Era, vol. 14, no. 1, 2015, pp. 127–31. JSTOR,
www.jstor.org/stable/43903070.
12. Mathews, George. “REFLECTIONS OF JAY GATSBY, THE INVISIBLE
PSYCHOANALYTICAL HERO: AN EXPLORATION OF FREUDIAN PSYCHOANALYSIS IN
FITZGERALD’S THE GREAT GATSBY.” International Journal of Current Advanced
Research, vol. 10, no. 2, Feb. 2021, pp. 23894–96. ResearchGate,
www.researchgate.net/publication/350055040_REFLECTIONS_OF_JAY_GATSBY_THE_INVISIBLE_PSYCHOANALYTICAL_HERO_AN_EXPLORATION_OF_FREUDIAN_PSYCHOANALYSIS_IN_FITZGERALD'S_THE_GREAT_GATSBY.
13. Pearson, Roger L. “Gatsby: False Prophet of the American Dream.” The
English Journal, vol. 59, no. 5, 1970, pp. 638–45. JSTOR,
doi.org/10.2307/813939.
14. PEKAROFSKI, MICHAEL. “The Passing of Jay Gatsby: Class and Anti-Semitism
in Fitzgerald’s 1920s America.” The F. Scott Fitzgerald Review, vol. 10, 2012,
pp. 52–72. JSTOR,
www.jstor.org/stable/41693878.
15. Roberts, Marilyn. “‘Scarface, The Great Gatsby’, and the American Dream.”
Literature/Film Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 1, 2006, pp. 71–78. JSTOR,
www.jstor.org/stable/43797258.
16. Samuels, Charles Thomas. “The Greatness of ‘Gatsby.’” The Massachusetts
Review, vol. 7, no. 4, 1966, pp. 783–94. JSTOR,
www.jstor.org/stable/25087514.
17. SCRIBNER, CHARLES. “Celestial Eyes: From Metamorphosis to Masterpiece.”
The Princeton University Library Chronicle, vol. 53, no. 2, 1992, pp. 141–55.
JSTOR,
doi.org/10.2307/26410056.
18. Shumway, David R. “‘GATSBY’, THE JAZZ AGE, AND LUHRMANN LAND.” The Journal
of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, vol. 14, no. 1, 2015, pp. 132–37.
JSTOR,
www.jstor.org/stable/43903071.
19. Takeuchi, Yasuhiro. “Gatsby’s Green Light as a Traffic Signal: F. Scott
Fitzgerald’s Motive Force.” The F. Scott Fitzgerald Review, vol. 14, no. 1,
2016, pp. 198–214. JSTOR,
doi.org/10.5325/fscotfitzrevi.14.1.0198.
