Poetry and Poststructuralism: An AI-Powered Analysis

This blog is written as a task assigned by the head of the Department of English (MKBU), Prof. and Dr. Dilip Barad Sir. Here is the link to the professor's research article for background reading: Click here.

{getToc} $title={Table of Contents} $count={false}

To view the ChatGPT thread related to this blog: Click here.

Symphony of the Earth

Upon the dawn the golden meadows glow,

With dew like diamonds trembling on each blade;

A lark’s trill threads the air with tunes so low,

While chestnut breeze brings warmth through dappled shade.

The velvet moss upon my fingertips

Breathes earthy perfume bittersweet and deep;

I taste the sap upon my reddened lips,

As life unfurls from wooded roots asleep.

But lo, beyond this breath of green and bloom,

A whisper stirs the heart with wheeling wings;

It stirs my soul to banish darkest gloom,

And bids me rise where hope eternal sings.

In nature’s mirror I behold my soul,

And find through humble grace my spirit whole.

## Verbal Stage

(Close attention to paradoxes, binaries, “surface” word‑play)

### Paradox of animation vs. stillness

“dew like diamonds trembling on each blade”

– Diamonds are inert; tremble implies life. The simile enlivens the inanimate, exposing a tension between solidity (diamond) and motion (tremble).

### Binary reversals and collapsing oppositions

“golden meadows” ↔ “wet, black bough” (echoing Pound)

– “golden” suggests warmth and day; “black” implies night or decay, yet both coexist in the same visual field.

“chestnut breeze” & “velvet moss”

– Touch (“velvet”) and smell (“perfume”) intermingle; the text privileges sensory overlap over discrete categories.

### Contradictory imagery

“life unfurls from wooded roots asleep”

– Roots cannot both sleep (dormant) and unfurl (active growth) simultaneously; the line undercuts its own celebration of vitality.

### Metaphorical slippage

“nature’s mirror I behold my soul”

– A mirror reflects without altering, yet “behold my soul” suggests inner transformation. The metaphor both reveals and obscures.

## Textual Stage

(Larger‑scale shifts, breaks, omissions, fault‑lines in perspective)

### Stanzaic shift / volta

Stanzas I–II: rich sensory immersion in external nature

Stanza III (“But lo…”): sudden inward turn—“whisper stirs the heart”—marking a volta from outer description to interior awakening

Stanza IV: resolution in self‑recognition (“In nature’s mirror…”), yet this “resolution” carries the same instabilities found earlier.

### Shift in voice and focus

Early stanzas: predominantly third‑person, painterly scene‑setting (“golden meadows glow”)

From line 9 onward: first‑person (“it stirs my soul,” “I behold”), foregrounding the speaker’s psyche over the landscape.

### Omissions and elisions

Why does the heart need banishing of gloom? The poem never accounts for the origins of that gloom—an unspoken absence that haunts the speaker’s shift.

No specific locus (“where hope eternal sings”)—the landscape is simultaneously concrete (meadows, moss) and unlocatable (eternal hope), producing a fault‑line between the particular and the universal.

## Linguistic Stage

(Moments that call into question language’s adequacy or self‑contradictory speech acts)

### The mirror‑metaphor trap

Claim: nature “mirrors” the soul, implying faithful reflection.

Yet any mirror is itself a constructed surface; the poem’s language “mirrors” nothing but other words, calling attention to its own artifice.

### Speech‑act contradiction

The speaker “find[s] through humble grace my spirit whole,” yet the grammar (“find through grace”) disguises an assertion of mastery over self—grace becomes a tool rather than a gift, contradicting humility.

### Unstated unsayable

The poem luxuriates in sensory detail but never names the threat or void beneath “darkest gloom.” The lyrics gesture toward an unspeakable absence, yet they speak of it, enacting the very failure they imply.

## Conclusion of Deconstruction

Although “Symphony of the Earth” first appears as a unified celebration of nature’s beauty, a deconstructive reading exposes its internal tensions—between movement and stillness, self and world, speech and silence. The text fractures under scrutiny, revealing crevices where meaning drifts and the constructedness of poetic language becomes unavoidably apparent.

Margins of Being

We seek ourselves within a shifting glass;

As mirrored fragments slip through swift hour’s pass;

The self’s a mask that we can never feel;

We dance with absent selves as though they’re real.

Each dawn we trace the fading of our name;

As mirrored hours entomb the selfsame frame;

We taste the void that churns beneath our bones;

And roll in silent questions like cold stones.

At twilight’s edge I stand as caged bird freed;

Yet wings untame still ache with vital need;

A windless sky contrives my errant flight;

And locks of ether bind my shielded light.

My mind’s a hollow chalice brimming truth;

Yet seeking empties deeper than my youth;

I pluck at fragrant dreams like wilting rose;

Then fear their thorns impose on those repose.

## The Primacy of the Signifier

Like Pound’s faces/petals or Williams’s wheelbarrow, Belsey reminds us that what poetry does is isolate words—“shifting glass,” “mirrored fragments”—from the “noise” of everyday life, inviting us to build fresh associations.

Shifting glass and mirrored fragments: these images never point at actual mirrors or broken reflections in the world; instead they set up a network of ideas—instability, self‑alienation, multiplicity—that we supply by juxtaposing “shifting” with “glass,” “fragments” with “swift hour’s pass.”

Absent selves vs. real: the paradox of “absent selves as though they’re real” turns absence itself into a shimmering signifier, displacing any referent “self” into the margins.

In isolating these phrases on the quatrains’ white space, the poem mimics Imagist emphasis on visual layout: each couplet (glass/pass, feel/real, etc.) becomes a mini‑unit of meaning, foregrounding its rhymes and inviting us to dwell on sound as much as sense.

## Difference and Deferral

Belsey invokes Derrida’s différance to show that words like “self,” “mask,” “void,” “chalice” only gain traction through their differences from one another:

Self / mask: to say the self is a mask undoes any notion of an authentic core; in fact the poem privileges the mask, the surface play of signifiers, over any “true” identity underneath.

Void / bones: “void” suggests emptiness; “bones” suggest structure—yet they co‑occur (“void that churns beneath our bones”), collapsing presence and absence into the same paradoxical field.

These chains of difference defer any stable meaning: each signifier points us to the next, but never to a final “truth” about identity.

## The Semiotic Pulse

Julia Kristeva’s semiotic—the pre‑linguistic rhythmic drive—reappears here in the poem’s sound patterns:

Trembling / thread / tunes (stanza I) and plucked / plucking / prayer‑like echoes (stanza IV): these clusters of t‑ and p‑alliteration evoke a child‑like babble, pulling us beneath the “thetic” logic of argument into a realm of sensation.

The heroic‑couplet rhyme (AA BB) in each quatrain creates a pendulum swing: expectation and arrival, only to set us off again at the next stanza—an endless rhythm of desire and deferral.

Thus the poem’s musicality disrupts any straightforward “argument” about self and world, privileging sensation over thesis.

## Language Constitutes Reality

Belsey’s reading of Williams shows that “red” and “white” may seem to point at real things, yet they conjure a “toy” or “childlike” purity. Likewise “Margins of Being” repeatedly gestures at a world beyond language:

“Dance with absent selves”: we’re invited to feel a bodily choreography, yet no actual dancers exist—only words dancing on the page.

“Hollow chalice brimming truth”: the oxymoron (“hollow” vs. “brimming”) reveals that language both creates and faults its own metaphors—truth is presented only insofar as the cup is empty.

In each case, the poem shows itself “issuing from language”—not merely reporting an inner state or external scene, but performing that state in the slippages and gaps between signifiers.

## Conclusion: The Textual Unconscious

By isolating its key images, playing its sounds for sensual effect, and denying any fixed referent, “Margins of Being” enacts exactly what Belsey describes:

Parallels of signifiers invite us to “see” selves, masks, voids.

Isolation on the page foregrounds each fragment against a silent background.

Semiotic rhythms disrupt any unified argument.

Metaphorical paradoxes expose language’s constitutive power—and its unreliability.

The poem thus becomes a “textual unconscious” where identity is never stable, meaning always deferred, and the world of words more real than any world outside the text.