When Myths Speak Climate: Re-thinking Ecological Knowledge in Amitav Ghosh’s ‘Gun Island’
When Myths Speak Climate: Re-thinking Ecological Knowledge in Amitav Ghosh’s ‘Gun Island’
This blog is written as a task assigned by the head of the Department of
English (MKBU), Prof. and Dr.
Dilip Barad
Sir. Here is the link to the professor's worksheet for background reading:
Click here.
Here is the link to the blog:
Click here.
Here is the link to the video:
Click here.
To read more about the
Flipped Learning Network:
Click here.
{getToc} $title={Table of Contents} $count={false}
|
| Image courtesy: Gemini/(Nano Banana Pro) - Representational |
Video 1: Characters and Summary - 1 | Sundarbans | Gun Island | Amitav Ghosh
Infographic:
|
| Image courtesy: NotebookLM - Representational |
Slide deck:
This video has been generated using NotebookLM:
Research Activity:
Myth as Ecological Epistemology in ‘Gun Island’: Re-enchanting Climate Change Through Folklore and Non-Human Agency
To view the NotebookLM notebook related to this blog:
Click here.
Prompt 1 - Create a table showing each source with its publication date, author credentials, and whether it's primary source, secondary analysis or opinion piece.
The following table provides a breakdown of the sources provided,
detailing their publication dates, author credentials, and
classifications based on the provided material.
|
Source Title/Author
|
Publication Date
|
Author Credentials
|
Source Type
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Reclaiming the Unreal...
(Zakiyah Tasnim)
|
15 August 2025 |
Department of English,
University of Chittagong, Bangladesh |
Secondary Analysis
(Research Article) |
|
Spectrum, Volume 18
(Various Authors)
|
June 2023 |
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of English Language and Literature, Central Women’s
University |
Secondary Analysis
(Journal Issue) |
|
A Powerful Translingual Cli-Fi Story...
(Lisa Schantl)
|
8 October 2021 |
Writer for
Tint Journal; specialist in translingual literature |
Opinion Piece
(Book Review) |
|
Amitav Ghosh Meets His Own Demand...
(Michael Berry)
|
2026
(Copyright date) |
Freelance writer
for the Boston Globe
and LA Review of Books |
Opinion Piece
(Book Review) |
|
Beyond Multiculturalism...
(TIJER.org)
|
2025
(Contextual) |
Open Access Journal
for Engineering Research |
Secondary Analysis
(Academic Paper) |
|
Reconstructing Bengali Popular Folklores...
(Animesh Roy)
|
October 2024 |
Senior Research Fellow, Dept. of Humanistic Studies, IIT Varanasi |
Secondary Analysis
(Peer-Reviewed Journal) |
|
Decolonial Myths and Demi-gods...
(Joseph & Koudur)
|
2023 |
PhD Candidate and Professor
at National Institute of Technology Karnataka |
Secondary Analysis
(Academic Journal) |
|
Eco-Spiritual Threads...
(Religions Journal)
|
18 July 2025 |
Department of English, Ball State University |
Secondary Analysis
(Journal Article) |
|
Exploring Environmental Degradation...
(Dr. Deep Shikha Karthik)
|
31 October 2024 |
Assistant Professor of English, F.A.A Govt. P. G. College Mahmudabad |
Secondary Analysis
(Refereed Journal) |
|
Exploring Porous Borders...
(Sabine Lauret-Taft)
|
30 November 2025 |
Associate Professor, Université Marie & Louis Pasteur |
Secondary Analysis
(Academic Essay) |
|
Gun Island by Amitav Ghosh...
(Keshava Guha)
|
July 2019 |
Contributor to Literary Review |
Opinion Piece
(Book Review) |
|
HAUNTED ECOLOGIES...
(Komal Nazir)
|
May 2025 |
Doctor of Philosophy in English, Oklahoma State University |
Secondary Analysis
(PhD Dissertation) |
|
Humans and Nonhumans...
(Eva-Karin Berlingieri)
|
5 January 2024 |
Bachelor’s Programme Student, Mid Sweden University |
Secondary Analysis
(Thesis Project) |
|
Nonhuman and the Anthropocene...
(Ramesh Fayez)
|
March 2024 |
Research Scholar, English Department, Aligarh Muslim University |
Secondary Analysis
(Peer-Reviewed Journal) |
|
Kritika Kultura - Archium Ateneo
(Vincenz Serrano)
|
March 2025 |
Editor-in-Chief
and Associate Professor, Ateneo de Manila University |
Secondary Analysis
(Scholarly Journal) |
|
Myth as Epistemology...
(Kalaivani & Selvi)
|
August 2025 |
PhD Research Scholar and Assistant Professor, Vellalar College for Women |
Secondary Analysis
(Academic Journal) |
|
Nonhuman agency in the Anthropocene...
(UNITesi)
|
2024/2026
(Contextual) |
University-affiliated researcher
(Thesis context) |
Secondary Analysis
(University Thesis) |
|
Out of This World...
(Emily Merson)
|
6 October 2025 |
York University, Canada |
Secondary Analysis
(Journal Article) |
|
Gun Island and The Great Derangement...
(Forrest Brown)
|
15 April 2021 |
Climate writer
and creator of Stories for Earth |
Opinion Piece
(Podcast Summary/Analysis) |
|
“Gun Island” by Amitav Ghosh
(Arunava Sinha)
|
20 July 2019 |
Contributor to Asian Review of Books
|
Opinion Piece
(Book Review) |
Prompt 2- Which of these sources are most frequently cited or referenced by other sources in this notebook?
Based on the sources provided, the most frequently cited and
referenced works within this notebook are the foundational texts by Amitav Ghosh
himself, followed by several key scholarly articles and reviews that
appear across multiple bibliographies.
Primary Foundational References
The two works that serve as the anchor for almost every other source
in the notebook are:
• The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable (2016):
This non-fiction work is cited by nearly every secondary analysis to
contextualise Ghosh's critique of modern literature and environmental
"blindness".
• Gun Island (2019):
As the primary subject of study, it is referenced as the core text in
all analyses, reviews, and comparative studies provided.
Most Cited Secondary Sources
Among the secondary analyses and opinion pieces listed in your source
table, the following are referenced most frequently by other scholars
in the collection:
1. Bose, Trina and Amrita Satapathy ("The Crisis of Climate and
Immigration..."):
This study (contained within Source 2: Spectrum) is a major point of reference for other researchers exploring the
intersection of migration and ecology.
2. Keshava Guha (Source 11: "Gun Island by Amitav Ghosh..."):
This review is frequently cited as a significant critical reaction to
the novel’s structure and themes.
3. Rakibul Hasan Khan ("Amitav Ghosh’s Gun Island: The Climate Crisis
and Planetary Environmentalism"):
This 2024 article has quickly become a standard reference for the most
recent scholarship in the notebook, appearing in the bibliographies of
several other 2024 and 2025 sources.
4. Rob Nixon (Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor):
While not one of the individual source files, this 2011 book is a
"theoretical staple" cited by nearly all the academic analyses to
explain the gradual nature of environmental destruction in Ghosh's
work.
Meta-References
Notably, Source 16 (Kalaivani & Selvi)
includes a list of references that explicitly points to other sources
in your notebook, including Source 5 (TIJER), Source 11 (Guha), Source 12 (Nazir), Source 10 (Lauret-Taft), and Source 17 (UNITesi). This indicates that these specific papers are being used as the
primary data for comparative literary analysis within the
collection.
To think of this relationship, imagine Amitav Ghosh
is the sun
at the centre of a solar system; all other sources are planets
(like Guha, Khan, and Nazir) that orbit him, but they also frequently
"reflect light" onto one another through their citations.
Prompt 3 - Summarize the primary perspective of the top five most substantial sources.
The following summaries outline the primary perspectives of the five
most substantial academic contributions provided in the sources,
focusing on their theoretical depth and analytical frameworks.
1. Jarula M.I. Wegner: The Decolonial Shift
Wegner describes a significant discursive shift from postcolonial to decolonial critiques, arguing that this transformation radicalises existing ideas to
confront the "continuing aftermath of enslavement". This perspective demands a departure from European conceptual hegemony
and the "coloniality of knowledge" that persists even in postcolonial
studies. By moving beyond Western elite university paradigms and European
languages, Wegner advocates for transculturality and South-South relations
as essential tools for decolonizing national and imperial
memories.
2. Komal Nazir: The Anthropocene Gothic
Nazir asserts that the narrative frameworks of the realist novel—grounded in Enlightenment ideals of linear progress and human
mastery—are inherently inadequate
for representing the ruptures of the climate crisis. This source proposes the "Anthropocene Gothic"
as a generative theoretical lens, viewing the Earth as a "haunted archive" of unresolved violence
and non-human agency. The perspective suggests that only by unsettling Enlightenment rationality
and embracing mythic or folkloric epistemologies can literature
reflect the affective textures of a damaged world.
3. Emily Merson: Decolonial Feminist Speculation
Merson adopts a decolonial feminist framework
to critique neoliberal climate action models that prioritise state
transparency and quantitative metrics. This perspective uses the "transnational uncanny"
as a qualitative method to reassemble repressed knowledge regarding
colonial extraction and hierarchies of precarity. By reading Ghosh's work as a speculative intertext, Merson argues that literature can unsettle the authority of disembodied objectivity
and affirm the labor of care required for planetary climate
justice.
4. Zakiyah Tasnim: Reclaiming the Unreal
Tasnim argues that the use of non-linear narrative and uncanny coincidences
in climate fiction serves as a resistance against "capitalist realism"
and Enlightenment binaries. This perspective posits that animals, natural forces, and mythic
beings must be viewed as active agents
rather than inert backdrops to human drama. Ultimately, Tasnim suggests that reclaiming wonder and myth
is essential for cultivating the empathy and humility needed to face
an uncertain ecological future.
5. Bhoj Raj Adhikari: Biocentrism and Relational Ethics
Adhikari examines the novel through biocentrism, a philosophy that affirms the intrinsic moral worth of all living beings
independent of their utility to humans. This perspective critiques human exceptionalism and promotes an ethic of shared vulnerability
and multispecies solidarity. The source contends that postcolonial climate fiction acts as a literary intervention, reorienting the human-nature relationship toward a model of sacred interdependence.
To contextualise these viewpoints, one might compare the realist novel
to a map
that attempts to provide a clear, flat, and rational direction;
however, these sources argue that the Anthropocene
is a storm
so massive it renders the old map useless, requiring us to navigate
instead by the stars of myth
and the rhythms of the earth itself.
Prompt 4 - Identify 'Research Gap' for further research in this area.
Based on the sources provided, several significant research gaps
exist for further academic inquiry into the intersections of climate
fiction, postcolonial studies, and environmental ethics. Scholars have
identified the following areas where deeper investigation is
required:
1. Integration of Diverse Non-Western Cosmologies
While recent work has begun to examine Hindu eco-spiritual frameworks
in the context of Gun Island, current scholarship remains conceptually fragmented, often focusing on isolated themes. There is a substantial gap in exploring how Indigenous, African, Islamic, Buddhist, and other non-Western cosmologies conceptualize ecological
belonging, karmic causality, and ethical relationality within
contemporary climate fiction.
2. Comparative Evolution of Ethics Across Ghosh’s Oeuvre
Much of the existing critical literature focuses on individual texts
like The Hungry Tide
or Gun Island
in isolation. A clear research gap exists for comparative studies
that investigate how biocentric, post-humanist, and environmental
ethics operate across Ghosh’s entire body of work, specifically tracing the evolution of these ideas into his more
recent non-fiction, such as The Nutmeg’s Curse.
3. Formal vs. Thematic Analysis of the "Anthropocene Gothic"
Scholars have noted that while many studies provide thematic readings
of "environmental haunting," they often fail to account for the formal and narrative disruptions
these conditions generate within the text. Further research could focus on how specific literary structures—such as non-linear timelines, fragmented narratives, and "Gothic
materiality"—serve as formal analogues to the unpredictability of
ecological collapse in the Global South.
4. The Lens of the "Postcolonial Nonhuman"
There is a specific call for research using the "unaddressed lens of the postcolonial nonhuman". This involves moving beyond viewing animals and natural forces as
mere metaphors for human suffering and instead analyzing them as active agents
that contest Western anthropocentric subjectivities shaped by colonial
modernity.
5. Expanding the Scope of Precarity
Current research highlights a lack of adequate portrayal regarding
the "age of precarity"
in contemporary South Asian literature. Future studies could investigate how neoliberal capitalistic ideologies
and anthropogenic crises intersect to create new, unregulated forms of
"hyper-precarity" that distinguish this historical moment from
previous eras of instability.
6. Philological and Cultural Transitions
A significant gap exists in understanding the multicultural transactions
within these stories. Many scholars remain unfamiliar with the specific mythic roots
(such as the Manasa myth) and the philological nuances
of the texts, which are often overshadowed by purely environmental or
scientific concerns.
To conceptualize these gaps, think of current research as a pioneer’s map
of a new continent. We have identified the major mountains (the themes
of climate change) and rivers (the primary myths), but the dense forests
of how these myths interact with other global religions, and the subterranean caves
of how the book's very structure mimics a broken world, remain largely
unmapped and waiting for deeper exploration.
Prompt 5 - Draft a Literature Review ending with hypotheses and research questions pertaining to this research gap.
The following literature review examines the intersections of climate fiction (cli-fi), non-human agency, and decolonial
epistemologies, primarily focusing on the critical reception of Amitav Ghosh’s recent
works.
The Representational Crisis of the Anthropocene
Scholarship consistently identifies the Anthropocene
as a fundamental crisis of representation that unsettles inherited
frameworks of storytelling. Amitav Ghosh’s foundational non-fiction work, The Great Derangement
(2016), argues that the modern realist novel, shaped by Enlightenment ideals of reason and linear progress, is
"poorly equipped" to capture the strange, large-scale, and unpredictable
realities of ecological disruption. Realism’s emphasis on the "mundane" and individual subjectivity acts
as a mode of "concealment" that prevents readers from recognising the
urgency of the climate emergency. Consequently, critics suggest that the "Great Derangement" is a crisis of the imagination, where contemporary culture fails to reckon with a world where the
"improbable" has become the norm.
Reclaiming Myth as Ecological Epistemology
To address this representational impasse, Ghosh’s Gun Island
(2019) is viewed as a significant departure that reclaims myth, supernatural elements, and non-Western epistemologies. By reanimating the Bengali legend of the Gun Merchant (Bonduki Sadagar) and the snake goddess Manasa Devi, Ghosh constructs what scholars
term a "mythic ecological epistemology". This framework validates myth not as superstition but as a "trans-historical archive" and a "survival manual" that encodes past climate events, such as
those of the 17th-century Little Ice Age. Myth functions as an "ecological chronicle," helping communities
adapt to "slow violence"—the gradual, invisible destruction wrought by
environmental degradation.
The Postcolonial Non-human and Multispecies Agency
A central tenet of recent analysis is the restoration of non-human agency. Ghosh critiques "Cartesian dualism"—the Western belief that only humans possess minds while nature is an
inert backdrop. In Gun Island, animals like snakes, spiders, and dolphins
are elevated to the status of active historical agents and "non-human
interlocutors". This perspective promotes a "biocentric ethic" that affirms the intrinsic moral worth of all living beings
independent of their utility to humans. Some scholars define this as "multispecies justice," where human and non-human lives are seen as equally valuable and
interconnected in shared ecological futures.
Precarity, Migration, and the Colonialocene
Current research identifies an inescapable link between colonial extraction and contemporary global warming, a condition sometimes referred to as the "Colonialocene". Gun Island
illustrates how the global migration crisis
is a "karmic reverberation" of centuries of anti-Indigenous and
anti-Black colonial dispossession. The novel portrays "hyper-precarity"—a state of unregulated insecurity for migrant workers—situating them
as the "new subalterns of the global capitalist order". This "everyday Anthropocene" manifests as a "sticky" undoing of
bodily sovereignty, where the environment breaches the boundaries of the
self through mud, venom, or "hazardous transcorporeality".
Research Gap: Diverse Non-Western Cosmologies
Despite the depth of current studies, a significant research gap
remains in the integration of diverse non-Western cosmologies
beyond the Bengali-Hindu context. While the Manasa myth is
well-explored, current scholarship is "conceptually fragmented," lacking
an investigation into how African, Islamic, Buddhist, or Indigenous American cosmologies
might similarly re-enchant climate storytelling and provide alternative
models of "relational repair" in the global South. Furthermore, there is a need for a comparative evolution of ethics
across Ghosh’s entire oeuvre, tracing the transition from regional
ecological concerns in The Hungry Tide
to the globalised "planetary environmentalism" of his more recent
works.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hypotheses
1. The integration of pluralistic non-Western cosmologies
provides a more resilient narrative structure for representing
"hyper-objects" like global warming than the frameworks of Western
secular realism.
2. The deployment of the "postcolonial non-human"
serves as a specific literary device to dismantle the "Colonial Matrix
of Power," rendering the history of extractive capitalism visible
through "storied matter".
Research Questions
1. How do diverse spiritual frameworks
(beyond Bengali folklore) reconfigure the "environmental uncanny" to
foster intergenerational and trans-species empathy?
2. In what ways does the formal structure of the "Anthropocene Gothic"
evolve across Ghosh’s body of work to move from a "crisis of
imagination" to a "decolonial subjectification" of the planet?
To understand this field, imagine Western Realism
as a clinical laboratory
where everything is measured, but nothing is felt; Ghosh’s work
acts as a forest at night, where we must stop relying on our "logical eyes" and instead listen
to the "ancient rhythms" of the Earth to find our way out.
















